Gittelsohn Joel, Merkle Sarah, Story Mary, Stone Elaine J, Steckler Allan, Noel Jessica, Davis Sally, Martin Catherine J, Ethelbah Becky
Center for Human Nutrition, Department of International Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205-2179, USA.
Prev Med. 2003 Dec;37(6 Pt 2):S97-106. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.08.010.
Pathways was a multisite school-based study to prevent obesity in American Indian school children by encouraging healthy eating and physical activity.
Over the 3-year study, a total of 290 in-depth interviews were conducted with school administrators, food service managers, classroom teachers, and physical education instructors in all 21 intervention schools to examine support and barriers for Pathways. Analysis included qualitative assessment of key themes using NUD*IST and quantitative modeling of the impact of a school climate score on implementation of intervention components.
Overall, teachers, food service managers, and physical education instructors were supportive of the Pathways interventions. School administration and lack of family participation were perceived barriers at some schools. Attitudes toward the program ranged from neutral to positive during the first year, with about two-thirds giving positive ratings, with greater variation in successive years. Overall, the mean score was 3.5 on a 5-point scale (1=very negative, 5=very positive). School climate score was positively associated with classroom curriculum and student exposure indices, but not with family attendance, food service, or physical activity implementation indices. The latter two indices were associated with site.
An assessment of school climate through interviews is useful in understanding successes and failures in a school-based health intervention and can predict implementation success for some programs.
“路径”是一项以学校为基础的多地点研究,旨在通过鼓励健康饮食和体育活动来预防美国印第安学龄儿童肥胖。
在为期3年的研究中,对所有21所干预学校的学校管理人员、食品服务经理、课堂教师和体育教师进行了总共290次深入访谈,以研究“路径”的支持因素和障碍。分析包括使用NUD*IST对关键主题进行定性评估,以及对学校氛围得分对干预措施实施影响的定量建模。
总体而言,教师、食品服务经理和体育教师支持“路径”干预措施。在一些学校,学校管理和家庭参与度不足被视为障碍。在第一年,对该项目的态度从中性到积极不等,约三分之二给予积极评价,在随后几年中差异更大。总体而言,在5分制量表上的平均得分为3.5分(1 =非常负面,5 =非常正面)。学校氛围得分与课堂课程和学生接触指数呈正相关,但与家庭参与度、食品服务或体育活动实施指数无关。后两个指数与地点有关。
通过访谈对学校氛围进行评估有助于理解基于学校的健康干预的成败,并可以预测某些项目的实施成功情况。