Adams Karen E
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health and Science University, USA.
J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972). 2003 Fall;58(4):223-6.
Physicians are independent moral agents whose values, like those of nonphysicians, are shaped by personal experience, religious beliefs, family, and lifetime mentors. Most individuals are free to exercise their moral values in the ways that they see fit within the boundaries of legality. Physicians' moral values take on special significance, however, when considering services patients may request but that contradict that physician's moral beliefs, such as termination of pregnancy. In this article I analyze the competing obligations to self and to patient that a conscientiously objecting physician must consider when his or her personal morality affects his or her relationship with the patient. Despite each physician's freedom to choose his or her mode of practice and which services to provide, a physician with a moral viewpoint that would prevent even counseling on certain options should consider practicing in an area of medicine in which the patient's right to full disclosure of options and informed consent is not compromised by the physician's personal moral stance.
医生是独立的道德主体,其价值观与非医生一样,受到个人经历、宗教信仰、家庭和人生导师的影响。大多数人可以在合法的范围内,以自己认为合适的方式践行自己的道德价值观。然而,当考虑患者可能要求但与医生道德信念相矛盾的服务时,比如终止妊娠,医生的道德价值观就具有了特殊意义。在本文中,我分析了出于良心拒行的医生在其个人道德影响其与患者关系时,必须考虑的对自己和对患者的相互冲突的义务。尽管每位医生都有选择自己执业方式和提供哪些服务的自由,但如果医生的道德观点甚至会妨碍就某些选择进行咨询,那么他应该考虑在一个患者充分了解各种选择并获得知情同意的权利不会因医生个人道德立场而受到损害的医学领域执业。