Sun Jiaren, Alison Stalls M, Thompson Katherine L, Fisher Van Houten Nancy
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Sealy Center for Vaccine Development and Center for Biodefense and Emerging Infectious Diseases, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX 77555-1019, USA.
Cell Immunol. 2003 Sep;225(1):33-41. doi: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2003.09.004.
The induction of anergy, or T cell unresponsiveness to antigen, is preceded by T cell activation and cell division in response to fed antigens. These events parallel the activation observed in T cells following sensitization with antigen and adjuvant. The events that distinguish eventual sensitization versus tolerance remain unclear. Using a T lymphocyte transfer model specific to OVA, we demonstrated previously that oral encounter with antigen leads to functional anergy. Antigen-specific CD4+ T cells nevertheless become activated and cycle briefly after encounter with antigen. In this study, we measured the extent of cell cycling of antigen-specific T cells after oral encounter with their antigen. Whereas T cells cycle on the average of eight times in 4 days after conventional immunization, an abortive proliferation was observed in the draining LN T cells after oral encounter with antigen; OVA-specific T cells divided fewer times after exposure to fed OVA, compared to T cells in mice immunized with OVA. This abortive proliferation is antigen specific and not due to bystander suppression, as coadministration of an unrelated antigen that was previously used as a tolerogen does not alter the degree of abortive proliferation. Measurement of BrdU incorporation in mice that were previously fed ovalbumin indicates that up to 3 days following feeding, OVA-specific cells are actively cycling in vivo. However, by day 4, they have stopped cycling while identical T cells in OVA-sensitized mice continue to cycle. Our results indicate either that tolerance is a default pathway and a secondary stimulus is required at day 3 to progress to sensitization, or that elements that limit cell cycle progression are provided for tolerance induction.
无能的诱导,即T细胞对抗原无反应,之前是T细胞因摄入抗原而被激活并进行细胞分裂。这些事件与在用抗原和佐剂致敏后在T细胞中观察到的激活情况相似。区分最终致敏与耐受的事件仍不清楚。使用针对卵清蛋白(OVA)的T淋巴细胞转移模型,我们之前证明口服抗原会导致功能性无能。然而,抗原特异性CD4+ T细胞在遇到抗原后会被激活并短暂循环。在本研究中,我们测量了口服抗原后抗原特异性T细胞的细胞循环程度。传统免疫后T细胞在4天内平均循环8次,而口服抗原后在引流淋巴结T细胞中观察到增殖失败;与用OVA免疫的小鼠中的T细胞相比,暴露于摄入的OVA后OVA特异性T细胞分裂次数更少。这种增殖失败是抗原特异性的,并非由于旁观者抑制,因为同时给予先前用作耐受原的无关抗原不会改变增殖失败的程度。对先前喂食卵清蛋白的小鼠中BrdU掺入的测量表明,喂食后长达3天,OVA特异性细胞在体内积极循环。然而,到第4天,它们停止循环,而OVA致敏小鼠中的相同T细胞继续循环。我们的结果表明,要么耐受是默认途径,在第3天需要二次刺激才能进展为致敏,要么为耐受诱导提供了限制细胞周期进程的因素。