Suppr超能文献

高风险手术的区域化及其对患者出行时间的影响。

Regionalization of high-risk surgery and implications for patient travel times.

作者信息

Birkmeyer John D, Siewers Andrea E, Marth Nancy J, Goodman David C

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH 03756, USA.

出版信息

JAMA. 2003 Nov 26;290(20):2703-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.20.2703.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Given the strong volume-outcome relationships observed with many surgical procedures, restricting some procedures to hospitals exceeding a minimum volume standard is advocated. However, such regionalization policies might cause unreasonable travel burdens for surgical patients.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate how minimum volume standards for esophagectomy and pancreatic resection would affect how long patients must travel for these procedures.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Simulated trial based on Medicare claims and US road network data. All US hospitals in the 48 continental states were in the study if their surgical procedures included esophagectomy and pancreatic resection. Data from Medicare patients (N = 15,796) undergoing these 2 procedures for cancer between 1994 and 1999 were used.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Additional travel time for patients required to change to higher-volume centers as a result of alternative hospital volume standards (procedures per year).

RESULTS

With low-volume standards (1/year for pancreatectomy; 2/year for esophagectomy), approximately 15% of patients would change to higher-volume centers, with negligible effect on their travel times. Most patients would need to travel less than 30 additional minutes (74% pancreatectomy; 76% esophagectomy). Many patients already lived closer to a higher-volume hospital (25% pancreatectomy; 26% esophagectomy). Conversely, with very high-volume standards (>16/year for pancreatectomy; >19/year for esophagectomy), approximately 80% of patients would change to higher-volume centers. More than 50% of these patients would increase their travel time by more than 60 minutes. Travel times would increase most for patients living in rural areas.

CONCLUSIONS

Many patients travel past a higher-volume center to undergo surgery at a low-volume hospital. If not set too high, hospital volume standards could be implemented for selected operations without imposing unreasonable travel burdens on patients.

摘要

背景

鉴于在许多外科手术中观察到的手术量与治疗结果之间存在密切关系,有人主张将某些手术限制在超过最低手术量标准的医院进行。然而,这种区域化政策可能会给手术患者带来不合理的出行负担。

目的

评估食管癌切除术和胰腺切除术的最低手术量标准会如何影响患者接受这些手术所需的出行时间。

设计、地点和患者:基于医疗保险索赔数据和美国道路网络数据进行的模拟试验。美国本土48个州的所有医院,只要其手术项目包括食管癌切除术和胰腺切除术,均纳入研究。使用了1994年至1999年间接受这两种癌症手术的医疗保险患者(N = 15796)的数据。

主要观察指标

由于替代医院手术量标准(每年手术例数),患者转至手术量更高的中心所需的额外出行时间。

结果

在低手术量标准下(胰腺切除术每年1例;食管癌切除术每年2例),约15%的患者会转至手术量更高的中心,对其出行时间的影响可忽略不计。大多数患者额外出行时间不到30分钟(胰腺切除术患者占74%;食管癌切除术患者占76%)。许多患者居住的地方距离手术量更高的医院更近(胰腺切除术患者占25%;食管癌切除术患者占26%)。相反,在非常高的手术量标准下(胰腺切除术每年>16例;食管癌切除术每年>19例),约80%的患者会转至手术量更高的中心。其中超过50%的患者出行时间会增加60分钟以上。农村地区患者的出行时间增加最多。

结论

许多患者前往手术量较低的医院进行手术时,会路过手术量更高的中心。如果医院手术量标准设定不过高,那么对于某些特定手术可以实施该标准,而不会给患者带来不合理的出行负担。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验