Suppr超能文献

安大略省高手术量医院和低手术量医院在5种主要外科手术中的手术死亡率差异:估算通过区域化可能挽救的生命数量。

Differences in operative mortality between high- and low-volume hospitals in Ontario for 5 major surgical procedures: estimating the number of lives potentially saved through regionalization.

作者信息

Urbach David R, Bell Chaim M, Austin Peter C

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.

出版信息

CMAJ. 2003 May 27;168(11):1409-14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous research has shown that persons undergoing certain high-risk surgical procedures at high-volume hospitals (HVHs) have a lower risk of postoperative death than those undergoing surgery at low-volume hospitals (LVHs). We estimated the absolute number of operative deaths that could potentially be avoided if 5 major surgical procedures in Ontario were restricted to HVHs.

METHODS

We collected data on all persons who underwent esophagectomy (613), colon or rectal resection for colorectal cancer (18 898), pancreaticoduodenectomy (686), pulmonary lobectomy or pneumonectomy for lung cancer (5156) or repair of an unruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) (6279) in Ontario from Apr. 1, 1994, to Mar. 31, 1999. We calculated the excess number of operative deaths (defined as deaths in the period from the day of the operation to 30 days thereafter), adjusted for age, sex and comorbidity, among the 75% of persons treated in LVHs, as compared with the 25% treated in the highest-volume quartile of hospitals. Bootstrap methods were used to estimate 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Of the 31 632 persons undergoing any of the 5 procedures, 1341 (4.24%) died within 30 days of surgery. If the 75% of persons treated at the LVHs had instead been treated at the HVHs, the annual number of lives potentially saved would have been 4 (95% CI, 0 to 9) for esophagectomy, 6 (95% CI, 1 to 11) for pancreaticoduodenectomy, 1 (95% CI, -10 to 13) for major lung resection and 14 (95% CI, 1 to 25) for repair of unruptured AAA. For resection of colon or rectum, the regionalization strategy would not have saved any lives, and 17 lives (95% CI, 36 to -3) would potentially have been lost.

INTERPRETATION

A small number of operative deaths are potentially avoidable by performing 4 of 5 complex surgical procedures only at HVHs in Ontario. In determining health policy, the most compelling argument for regionalizing complex surgical procedures at HVHs may not be the prevention of a large number of such deaths.

摘要

背景

先前的研究表明,在高容量医院(HVHs)接受某些高风险外科手术的患者,其术后死亡风险低于在低容量医院(LVHs)接受手术的患者。我们估计了如果安大略省的5种主要外科手术仅限于在高容量医院进行,可能避免的手术死亡绝对数量。

方法

我们收集了1994年4月1日至1999年3月31日期间在安大略省接受食管切除术(613例)、结直肠癌结肠或直肠切除术(18898例)、胰十二指肠切除术(686例)、肺癌肺叶切除术或全肺切除术(5156例)或未破裂腹主动脉瘤(AAA)修复术(6279例)的所有患者的数据。我们计算了低容量医院治疗的75%患者中,与在最高容量四分位数医院治疗的25%患者相比,经年龄、性别和合并症调整后的手术死亡超额数量(定义为从手术当天起至术后30天内的死亡)。采用自助法估计95%置信区间(CIs)。

结果

在接受这5种手术中的任何一种手术的31632名患者中,1341名(4.24%)在手术后30天内死亡。如果在低容量医院接受治疗的75%患者改为在高容量医院接受治疗,食管切除术每年可能挽救的生命数量为4例(95%CI,0至9例),胰十二指肠切除术为6例(95%CI,1至11例),大肺切除术为1例(95%CI,-10至13例),未破裂AAA修复术为14例(95%CI,1至25例)。对于结肠或直肠切除术,区域化策略不会挽救任何生命,并且可能会损失17条生命(95%CI,36至-3例)。

解读

在安大略省,仅在高容量医院进行5种复杂外科手术中的4种,可能避免少量手术死亡。在确定卫生政策时,将复杂外科手术在高容量医院进行区域化的最有说服力的论据可能不是预防大量此类死亡。

相似文献

4
Small rural hospitals and high-risk operations: how would regionalization affect surgical volume and hospital revenue?
J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Nov;203(5):599-604. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.07.009. Epub 2006 Sep 27.
10
Hospital teaching status and outcomes of complex surgical procedures in the United States.
Arch Surg. 2004 Feb;139(2):137-41. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.139.2.137.

引用本文的文献

2
Hospital volume-mortality association after esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Int J Surg. 2024 May 1;110(5):3021-3029. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001185.
3
Eugene Nicholas Myers' Lecture on Head and Neck Cancer, 2020: The Surgeon as a Prognostic Factor in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Undergoing Surgery.
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Aug 4;27(3):e536-e546. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1761170. eCollection 2023 Jul.
5
Mortality factors in pancreatic surgery: A systematic review. How important is the hospital volume?
Int J Surg. 2022 May;101:106640. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106640. Epub 2022 May 4.
6
Surgical Outcomes in Canada and the United States: An Analysis of the ACS-NSQIP Clinical Registry.
World J Surg. 2022 May;46(5):1039-1050. doi: 10.1007/s00268-022-06444-w. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
7
Regionalization for health improvement: A systematic review.
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 22;15(12):e0244078. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244078. eCollection 2020.
9
Spontaneous regionalization of esophageal cancer surgery: an analysis of the National Cancer Database.
J Thorac Dis. 2018 Mar;10(3):1721-1731. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.02.12.
10
The Case Volume Issue in Head and Neck Oncology.
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2017 Oct 27;18(11):65. doi: 10.1007/s11864-017-0507-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Is volume related to outcome in health care? A systematic review and methodologic critique of the literature.
Ann Intern Med. 2002 Sep 17;137(6):511-20. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-137-6-200209170-00012.
3
Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States.
N Engl J Med. 2002 Apr 11;346(15):1128-37. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa012337.
7
Influence of hospital procedure volume on outcomes following surgery for colon cancer.
JAMA. 2000 Dec 20;284(23):3028-35. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.23.3028.
9
Should we regionalize major surgery? Potential benefits and policy considerations.
J Am Coll Surg. 2000 Mar;190(3):341-9. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(99)00270-7.
10
High-risk surgery--follow the crowd.
JAMA. 2000 Mar 1;283(9):1191-3. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.9.1191.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验