Urbach David R, Bell Chaim M, Austin Peter C
Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.
CMAJ. 2003 May 27;168(11):1409-14.
Previous research has shown that persons undergoing certain high-risk surgical procedures at high-volume hospitals (HVHs) have a lower risk of postoperative death than those undergoing surgery at low-volume hospitals (LVHs). We estimated the absolute number of operative deaths that could potentially be avoided if 5 major surgical procedures in Ontario were restricted to HVHs.
We collected data on all persons who underwent esophagectomy (613), colon or rectal resection for colorectal cancer (18 898), pancreaticoduodenectomy (686), pulmonary lobectomy or pneumonectomy for lung cancer (5156) or repair of an unruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) (6279) in Ontario from Apr. 1, 1994, to Mar. 31, 1999. We calculated the excess number of operative deaths (defined as deaths in the period from the day of the operation to 30 days thereafter), adjusted for age, sex and comorbidity, among the 75% of persons treated in LVHs, as compared with the 25% treated in the highest-volume quartile of hospitals. Bootstrap methods were used to estimate 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Of the 31 632 persons undergoing any of the 5 procedures, 1341 (4.24%) died within 30 days of surgery. If the 75% of persons treated at the LVHs had instead been treated at the HVHs, the annual number of lives potentially saved would have been 4 (95% CI, 0 to 9) for esophagectomy, 6 (95% CI, 1 to 11) for pancreaticoduodenectomy, 1 (95% CI, -10 to 13) for major lung resection and 14 (95% CI, 1 to 25) for repair of unruptured AAA. For resection of colon or rectum, the regionalization strategy would not have saved any lives, and 17 lives (95% CI, 36 to -3) would potentially have been lost.
A small number of operative deaths are potentially avoidable by performing 4 of 5 complex surgical procedures only at HVHs in Ontario. In determining health policy, the most compelling argument for regionalizing complex surgical procedures at HVHs may not be the prevention of a large number of such deaths.
先前的研究表明,在高容量医院(HVHs)接受某些高风险外科手术的患者,其术后死亡风险低于在低容量医院(LVHs)接受手术的患者。我们估计了如果安大略省的5种主要外科手术仅限于在高容量医院进行,可能避免的手术死亡绝对数量。
我们收集了1994年4月1日至1999年3月31日期间在安大略省接受食管切除术(613例)、结直肠癌结肠或直肠切除术(18898例)、胰十二指肠切除术(686例)、肺癌肺叶切除术或全肺切除术(5156例)或未破裂腹主动脉瘤(AAA)修复术(6279例)的所有患者的数据。我们计算了低容量医院治疗的75%患者中,与在最高容量四分位数医院治疗的25%患者相比,经年龄、性别和合并症调整后的手术死亡超额数量(定义为从手术当天起至术后30天内的死亡)。采用自助法估计95%置信区间(CIs)。
在接受这5种手术中的任何一种手术的31632名患者中,1341名(4.24%)在手术后30天内死亡。如果在低容量医院接受治疗的75%患者改为在高容量医院接受治疗,食管切除术每年可能挽救的生命数量为4例(95%CI,0至9例),胰十二指肠切除术为6例(95%CI,1至11例),大肺切除术为1例(95%CI,-10至13例),未破裂AAA修复术为14例(95%CI,1至25例)。对于结肠或直肠切除术,区域化策略不会挽救任何生命,并且可能会损失17条生命(95%CI,36至-3例)。
在安大略省,仅在高容量医院进行5种复杂外科手术中的4种,可能避免少量手术死亡。在确定卫生政策时,将复杂外科手术在高容量医院进行区域化的最有说服力的论据可能不是预防大量此类死亡。