Henry K R, Lewis E R
Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis 95616.
Hear Res. 1992 Nov;63(1-2):1-6. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(92)90066-v.
One-tone rate suppression has been reported several times for auditory nerve fibers of mammalian and non-mammalian vertebrates. Because its properties are very similar to those of two-tone rate suppression, the possibility exists that one-tone rate suppression is the result of an interaction within the inner ear of the suppressing tonal stimulus and some ongoing extraneous acoustic stimulus. For this reason, reports of one-tone rate suppression often elicit suspicions that the investigators were not sufficiently careful in controlling leaks in their acoustic barriers or in the electrical pathways to their acoustic drivers. Recent reports of one-tone rate suppression in pigeon basilar-papillar fibers and goldfish saccular fibers were accompanied by descriptions of measures taken to avoid such leaks. In this paper, we describe one-tone rate suppression in a mammal, the Mongolian gerbil; and we demonstrate that the background spike activity being suppressed is not driven by either external sounds coming from outside the acoustic isolation test chamber or by non-stimulus electrical inputs to the acoustic driver. The suppressed background spike activity evidently arises from sources within the animal. These sources may be non-acoustic, associated with spontaneous pre- or post-synaptic ion-channel activity; or they may be acoustic sources--internal sound or vibration generators.
对于哺乳动物和非哺乳动物脊椎动物的听神经纤维,单音速率抑制现象已被多次报道。由于其特性与双音速率抑制非常相似,因此存在这样一种可能性,即单音速率抑制是抑制性音调刺激与内耳中某些持续的外部声刺激相互作用的结果。出于这个原因,关于单音速率抑制的报道常常引发人们的怀疑,即研究人员在控制隔音屏障或通向声驱动器的电通路中的泄漏方面不够谨慎。最近关于鸽基底乳头纤维和金鱼球囊纤维中单音速率抑制的报道,同时也描述了为避免此类泄漏所采取的措施。在本文中,我们描述了哺乳动物蒙古沙鼠中的单音速率抑制现象;并且我们证明,被抑制的背景放电活动既不是由隔音测试室外部传来的外部声音驱动的,也不是由声驱动器的非刺激电输入驱动的。被抑制的背景放电活动显然源于动物体内的某些来源。这些来源可能是非声学的,与突触前或突触后自发的离子通道活动有关;或者它们可能是声源——内部声音或振动发生器。