Park Hyeoun-Ae, Cameron Miriam E, Han Sung-Suk, Ahn Sung-Hee, Oh Hyo-Sook, Kim Kyeong-Uoon
Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
Nurs Ethics. 2003 Nov;10(6):638-53. doi: 10.1191/0969733003ne653oa.
This Korean study replicated a previously published American study. The conceptual framework and method combined ethical enquiry and phenomenology. The research questions were: (1) What is nursing students' experience of ethical problems involving nursing practice? and, (2) What is nursing students' experience of using an ethical decision-making model? The participants were 97 senior baccalaureate nursing students, each of whom described one ethical problem and chose to use one of five ethical decision-making models. From 97 ethical problems, five content categories emerged, the largest being health professionals (69%). The basic nature of the ethical problems was the students' experience of conflict, resolution and rationale. Using an ethical decision-making model helped 94% of the students. A comparison of the Korean and American results yields important implications for nursing ethics education, practice and research.
这项韩国研究重复了之前发表的一项美国研究。其概念框架和方法将伦理探究与现象学结合起来。研究问题如下：（1）护理专业学生在涉及护理实践的伦理问题上有怎样的经历？以及，（2）护理专业学生在使用伦理决策模型方面有怎样的经历？参与者为97名护理学学士学位高年级学生，每人描述一个伦理问题，并选择使用五种伦理决策模型中的一种。从97个伦理问题中，出现了五个内容类别，其中最大的类别是卫生专业人员（69%）。伦理问题的基本性质是学生对冲突、解决办法和基本原理的体验。使用伦理决策模型对94%的学生有帮助。对韩国和美国的研究结果进行比较，对护理伦理教育、实践和研究具有重要意义。
