• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对座位干预研究文献的批判性综述:关注行动不便的成年人。

Critical review of the research literature of seating interventions: a focus on adults with mobility impairments.

作者信息

Reid Denise T

机构信息

Department of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Assist Technol. 2002 Winter;14(2):118-29. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2002.10132061.

DOI:10.1080/10400435.2002.10132061
PMID:14651250
Abstract

An expanding area in rehabilitation practice is the prescription of seating interventions for clients with mobility impairments. The goal of this intervention is to enhance comfort and functional performance. The purpose of this paper is to review the body of knowledge from the research literature concerning the effectiveness or impact of seating interventions for adults who have mobility impairments. In this review both the scope and the gaps in the literature are defined to identify areas for future research. Specifically, this review was undertaken to identify what outcomes have been examined and what methods have been used in carrying out the research studies. A content analysis based on the conceptual framework of the modified International Classification of Impairment, Disability, and Handicap (ICIDH) and review guidelines for evaluating the quality of research studies has been helpful in informing future research design in this area. The results of the 16 studies that comprised this review indicate that the majority of research conducted thus far has numerous methodological limitations, which in turn limits the extent to which this body of research can be drawn upon to provide evidence for effectiveness in seating interventions. There was an emphasis on constructs at the impairment level and inadequate attention to functional and psychosocial issues. Recommendations regarding future research required to support this specific type of intervention are presented. This research review is an important first step in facilitating discussion among researchers, clinicians, research funders, and seating device users regarding future priorities for research and development in this practice area.

摘要

康复实践中一个不断扩展的领域是为行动不便的患者开具座位干预处方。这种干预的目标是提高舒适度和功能表现。本文的目的是回顾研究文献中有关座位干预对行动不便成年人的有效性或影响的知识体系。在这篇综述中,界定了文献的范围和差距,以确定未来的研究领域。具体而言,进行这项综述是为了确定已研究的结果以及开展这些研究采用了哪些方法。基于修改后的《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》(ICIDH)概念框架的内容分析以及评估研究质量的综述指南,有助于为该领域未来的研究设计提供参考。构成这项综述的16项研究结果表明,迄今为止进行的大多数研究存在诸多方法学上的局限性,这反过来又限制了利用这一研究体系为座位干预的有效性提供证据的程度。研究重点在于损伤层面的概念,而对功能和心理社会问题关注不足。本文提出了关于支持这类特定干预所需的未来研究的建议。这项研究综述是促进研究人员、临床医生、研究资助者和座位设备使用者就该实践领域未来的研发重点进行讨论的重要第一步。

相似文献

1
Critical review of the research literature of seating interventions: a focus on adults with mobility impairments.对座位干预研究文献的批判性综述:关注行动不便的成年人。
Assist Technol. 2002 Winter;14(2):118-29. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2002.10132061.
2
Impact of wheeled seated mobility devices on adult users' and their caregivers' occupational performance: a critical literature review.轮式坐式移动设备对成年使用者及其照顾者职业表现的影响:一项批判性文献综述
Can J Occup Ther. 2002 Dec;69(5):261-80. doi: 10.1177/000841740206900503.
3
mobilityRERC state of the science: How science influences public policy in seating and mobility.移动性RERC科学现状:科学如何影响座椅和移动性方面的公共政策。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2013 Nov;8(6):447-53. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2013.823575.
4
mobilityRERC state of the science conference: Considerations for developing an evidence base for wheeled mobility and seating service delivery.移动性RERC科学现状会议:为轮式移动和座椅服务提供建立证据基础的考量
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2013 Nov;8(6):462-71. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2013.823577. Epub 2013 Aug 14.
5
Establishing seating and wheeled mobility research priorities.确定座位及轮式移动设备的研究重点。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2007 May;2(3):169-72. doi: 10.1080/17483100701381715.
6
Functional outcomes associated with adaptive seating interventions in children and youth with wheeled mobility needs.与有轮式移动需求的儿童和青少年适应性座椅干预相关的功能结果。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 May;95(5):825-31. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.09.001. Epub 2013 Sep 11.
7
How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?“护理路径技术”对卒中护理服务整合的影响是如何衡量的,以及有哪些证据支持其在这方面的有效性?
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Mar;6(1):78-110. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2007.00098.x.
8
Use of single-subject research designs in seating and wheeled mobility research: a scoping review.单病例研究设计在座椅和轮式移动性研究中的应用:一项范围综述
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020 Apr;15(3):243-255. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2018.1550115. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
9
Impact of Seating and Mobility Services for Individuals With Disabilities in El Salvador.萨尔瓦多残疾人座椅和移动服务的影响。
Am J Occup Ther. 2023 Jul 1;77(4). doi: 10.5014/ajot.2023.050150.
10
Mobility devices to promote activity and participation: a systematic review.促进活动与参与的移动设备:一项系统综述
J Rehabil Med. 2009 Sep;41(9):697-706. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0427.