种族和族裔在四个州的儿童健康保险计划(SCHIP)中的作用:是否存在基线差异,以及这些差异对儿童健康保险计划意味着什么?

The role of race and ethnicity in the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) in four states: are there baseline disparities, and what do they mean for SCHIP?

作者信息

Shone Laura P, Dick Andrew W, Brach Cindy, Kimminau Kim S, LaClair Barbara J, Shenkman Elizabeth A, Col Jana F, Schaffer Virginia A, Mulvihill Frank, Szilagyi Peter G, Klein Jonathan D, VanLandeghem Karen, Bronstein Janet

机构信息

Strong Children's Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York 14642, USA.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 2003 Dec;112(6 Pt 2):e521.

DOI:
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Elimination of racial and ethnic disparities in health has become a major national goal. The State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) has the potential to reduce disparities among the children who enroll if they exhibit the same disparities that have been documented in previous studies of low-income children. To determine the potential impact of SCHIP on racial and ethnic disparities, it is critical to assess baseline levels of health disparities among children enrolling in SCHIP.

OBJECTIVE

To use data from the Child Health Insurance Research Initiative (CHIRI) to 1) describe the sociodemographic profile of new enrollees in SCHIP in Alabama, Florida, Kansas, and New York; 2) determine if there were differences in health insurance and health care experiences among white, black, and Hispanic SCHIP enrollees before enrollment in SCHIP; and 3) explore whether race or ethnicity, controlled for other factors, affected pre-SCHIP access to health coverage and health care.

SETTING

SCHIP programs in Alabama, Florida, Kansas, and New York, which together include 26% of SCHIP enrollees nationwide.

DESIGN

Telephone interview (mailed survey in Alabama) about the child's health, health insurance, and health care experiences conducted shortly after SCHIP enrollment to assess experience during the time period before SCHIP.

SAMPLE

New SCHIP enrollees (0-17.9 years old in Alabama, Kansas, and New York and 11.5-17.9 years old in Florida). Stratified sampling was performed in Kansas and New York, with results weighted to reflect statewide populations of new SCHIP enrollees.

MEASURES

Sociodemographic characteristics including income, education, employment, and other characteristics of the child and the family, race and ethnicity (white non-Hispanic, black non-Hispanic, and Hispanic [any race]), prior health insurance, health care access and utilization, and health status.

ANALYSES

Bivariate analyses were used to compare baseline measures upon enrollment for white, black, and Hispanic SCHIP enrollees. Multivariate analyses were performed to assess health status and health care access measures (prior insurance, presence of a usual source of care (USC), and use of preventive care), controlling for demographic factors described above. Weighted analyses (where appropriate) were performed by using SPSS, STATA, or SUDAAN.

RESULTS

Racial and ethnic composition varied across the SCHIP cohorts studied, with black and Hispanic children comprising the following proportion of enrollees, respectively: Alabama, 33% and <1%; Florida, 16% and 26%; Kansas, 12% and 15%; and New York, 24% and 36%. Black and Hispanic children were more likely to reside in single-parent and lower-income families. With some variation by state, children from minority groups were more likely to report poorer health status than were white children. Relative to white children, children from minority groups in Florida and New York were more likely to have been uninsured for the entire year before SCHIP enrollment. In all states, children from minority groups who had prior coverage were more likely to have previously been enrolled in Medicaid than in private health insurance and were less likely to have had employer-sponsored coverage compared with white children. Except in Alabama, there was a difference in having a USC, with children from minority groups less likely to have had a USC before SCHIP enrollment compared with white children. No consistent pattern of health care utilization before SCHIP was noted across states with respect to race or ethnicity. Findings from multivariate analyses, controlling for sociodemographic factors, generally confirmed that black and Hispanic children were more likely to have lacked insurance or a USC before enrollment in SCHIP and to have poorer health status compared with white children.

CONCLUSIONS

SCHIP is enrolling substantial numbers of racial and ethnic minority children. There are baseline racial and ethnic disparities among new enrollees in SCHIP, with black and Hispanic children faring worse than white children on many sociodemographic and health system measures, and there are differences among states in the prevalence and magnitude of these disparities. After controlling for sociodemographic factors, these disparities persisted. IMPLICATIONS FOR MONITORING AND IMPROVING SCHIP: SCHIP has the potential to play a critical role in efforts to eliminate racial and ethnic disparities in health among the children it serves. However, study findings indicate that programmatic efforts are necessary to ensure that disparities are not perpetuated. Program effectiveness and outcomes should be monitored by race and ethnicity to ensure equity in access, use, and outcomes across all racial and ethnic groups. Assessing the health characteristics and needs of new SCHIP enrollees can provide a benchmark for evaluating the program's impact on eliminating racial and ethnic disparities in health and inform service delivery enhancements.

摘要

背景

消除健康方面的种族和民族差异已成为一项主要的国家目标。如果参加儿童健康保险计划(SCHIP)的儿童呈现出与先前对低收入儿童研究中记录的相同差异,那么该计划就有可能减少参保儿童之间的差异。为了确定SCHIP对种族和民族差异的潜在影响,评估参加SCHIP的儿童健康差异的基线水平至关重要。

目的

利用儿童健康保险研究计划(CHIRI)的数据来:1)描述阿拉巴马州、佛罗里达州、堪萨斯州和纽约州参加SCHIP的新参保者的社会人口学特征;2)确定在参加SCHIP之前,白人、黑人及西班牙裔SCHIP参保者在医疗保险和医疗保健经历方面是否存在差异;3)探讨在控制其他因素的情况下,种族或民族是否会影响参加SCHIP之前获得医疗保险和医疗保健的机会。

地点

阿拉巴马州、佛罗里达州、堪萨斯州和纽约州的SCHIP计划,这几个州的参保者占全国SCHIP参保者总数的26%。

设计

在参加SCHIP后不久,通过电话访谈(阿拉巴马州采用邮寄调查问卷)了解儿童的健康状况、医疗保险和医疗保健经历,以评估参加SCHIP之前这段时间的情况。

样本

新参加SCHIP的儿童(阿拉巴马州、堪萨斯州和纽约州为0至17.9岁,佛罗里达州为11.5至17.9岁)。堪萨斯州和纽约州采用分层抽样,并对结果进行加权处理以反映全州新参加SCHIP儿童的总体情况。

测量指标

社会人口学特征,包括儿童及其家庭的收入、教育程度、就业情况和其他特征、种族和民族(非西班牙裔白人、非西班牙裔黑人以及西班牙裔[任何种族])、先前的医疗保险、获得医疗保健的机会和利用情况以及健康状况。

分析方法

采用双变量分析比较白人、黑人及西班牙裔SCHIP参保者参保时的基线指标。进行多变量分析以评估健康状况和获得医疗保健的指标(先前的保险、是否有固定的医疗服务来源[USC]以及预防性保健的使用情况),同时控制上述人口统计学因素。在适当情况下,使用SPSS、STATA或SUDAAN进行加权分析。

结果

在所研究的SCHIP队列中,种族和民族构成各不相同,黑人和西班牙裔儿童在参保者中所占比例分别如下:阿拉巴马州为33%和不到1%;佛罗里达州为16%和26%;堪萨斯州为12%和15%;纽约州为24%和36%。黑人和西班牙裔儿童更有可能居住在单亲家庭和低收入家庭。因州而异,少数族裔儿童比白人儿童更有可能报告健康状况较差。相对于白人儿童,佛罗里达州和纽约州的少数族裔儿童在参加SCHIP之前更有可能全年都没有保险。在所有州,之前有保险的少数族裔儿童比白人儿童更有可能先前参加过医疗补助计划而非私人医疗保险,且获得雇主提供保险的可能性更小。除阿拉巴马州外,在是否有固定医疗服务来源方面存在差异,与白人儿童相比,少数族裔儿童在参加SCHIP之前有固定医疗服务来源的可能性更小。在各州,未发现参加SCHIP之前在医疗保健利用方面存在与种族或民族相关的一致模式。多变量分析结果在控制社会人口学因素后,总体上证实与白人儿童相比,黑人和西班牙裔儿童在参加SCHIP之前更有可能没有保险或没有固定医疗服务来源,且健康状况较差。

结论

SCHIP正在招收大量的种族和民族少数群体儿童。参加SCHIP的新参保者在基线水平上存在种族和民族差异,在许多社会人口学和医疗系统指标方面,黑人和西班牙裔儿童的情况比白人儿童更差,而且这些差异在各州的发生率和程度也有所不同。在控制社会人口学因素后,这些差异仍然存在。对监测和改进SCHIP的启示:SCHIP有潜力在消除其所服务儿童的健康方面的种族和民族差异的努力中发挥关键作用。然而,研究结果表明,需要采取计划性措施以确保差异不会持续存在。应按种族和民族监测计划的有效性和结果,以确保所有种族和民族群体在获得服务、利用服务和服务结果方面的公平性。评估新参加SCHIP儿童的健康特征和需求可为评估该计划对消除健康方面的种族和民族差异的影响提供基准,并为改进服务提供参考。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索