Martin Mike, Hofer Scott M
Department of Gerontopsychology, Institute of Psychology, Zurich, Switzerland.
Gerontology. 2004 Jan-Feb;50(1):7-11. doi: 10.1159/000074382.
Developmental researchers use a variety of research designs to examine aging-related changes. Most longitudinal studies of aging are based on research designs that feature successive, widely spaced, assessments to estimate changes in cognitive performance. Such designs assume that short-term variations in cognitive performance are small relative to long-term changes or have modeled such phenomena as nuisance parameters.
There is now sufficient empirical evidence to establish intraindividual cognitive variability as a systematic source of individual differences and of important predictive value for aging-relevant outcomes.
After an overview of types of change, potential underlying processes, and adequate analytic designs, we discuss consequences for lifespan aging research.
We emphasize that interpretations of both cross-sectional and longitudinal results need to consider and specify theoretical assumptions about short-term and long-term changes.
Above and beyond the analysis of long-term mean changes, short- term changes are an important aspect of aging-related change, and their analysis may help to explain psychological processes of adaptation.
发展研究人员使用多种研究设计来检验与衰老相关的变化。大多数衰老纵向研究基于这样的研究设计,其特点是进行连续且间隔较大的评估,以估计认知表现的变化。此类设计假定,相对于长期变化,认知表现的短期变化较小,或者已将此类现象建模为干扰参数。
现在有足够的实证证据将个体内部认知变异性确立为个体差异的系统来源以及与衰老相关结果的重要预测指标。
在概述变化类型、潜在的潜在过程和适当的分析设计之后,我们讨论对寿命衰老研究的影响。
我们强调,横断面和纵向结果的解释都需要考虑并明确关于短期和长期变化的理论假设。
除了对长期平均变化的分析之外,短期变化是与衰老相关变化的一个重要方面,对其进行分析可能有助于解释心理适应过程。