Shillis Jacquie A, Hall Beverly A, Sneden Gail G, Gottlieb Nell H
Health and Human Services Commission, Austin, Texas, USA.
Health Educ Behav. 2003 Dec;30(6):771-88. doi: 10.1177/1090198103255522.
This case study examines a nonlegislative task force as it struggled to reach internal consensus despite external political constraints. The study highlights the convergence of politics and science, revealing complex issues likely to be confronted by advocates and public health officials. Three themes capture participants' experiences: context, sizing up the opportunities and constraints; task force process, tacit strategy to operate outside the political context and play the science card; and aftermath, a glass half full. The task force took advantage of ambiguous parameters, crafting a comprehensive statewide plan to reduce tobacco use and breaking out of the common public health paradigm of allowing budget considerations to drive program design. These internal victories could not sustain a policy success in the legislature. However, the group's product sets science-based standards for future program development, and the task force's process provides valuable insights into other states developing tobacco prevention and control policies.
本案例研究考察了一个非立法性特别工作组,该工作组尽管面临外部政治限制,但仍努力达成内部共识。该研究突出了政治与科学的融合,揭示了倡导者和公共卫生官员可能面临的复杂问题。三个主题概括了参与者的经历:背景,评估机遇与限制;特别工作组的过程,在政治背景之外运作并打出科学牌的隐性策略;以及后续影响,喜忧参半。特别工作组利用了模糊的参数,制定了一项全面的全州控烟计划,突破了让预算考量驱动项目设计的常见公共卫生模式。这些内部胜利未能在立法机构取得政策成功。然而,该小组的成果为未来项目开发设定了基于科学的标准,特别工作组的过程为其他制定烟草预防和控制政策的州提供了宝贵的见解。