Roguelov Christian, Eeckhout Eric, De Benedetti Edoardo, Coucke Philippe, Silber Sigmund, Baumgart Dietrich, Albiero Remo, Bonan Raoul, Wegscheider Karl, Urban Philip
Division of Cardiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland.
J Invasive Cardiol. 2003 Dec;15(12):706-9.
At present, vascular brachytherapy is the only efficient therapy for in-stent restenosis. Nevertheless, edge restenosis often related to geographical miss has been identified as a major limitation of the technique. The non-slippery cutting balloon has the potential to limit vascular barotraumas, which, together with low-dose irradiation at both ends of the radioactive source, are the prerequisite for geographical miss. This prospective study aimed to examine the efficacy of combining cutting balloon angioplasty and brachytherapy for in-stent restenosis. The Radiation in Europe NOvoste (RENO) registry prospectively tracked all patients who had been treated by coronary beta-radiation with the Beta-Cath System (Novoste Corporation, Brussels, Belgium) but were not included in a randomized radiation trial. A subgroup of patients with in-stent restenosis treated by cutting balloon angioplasty and coronary beta-radiation (group 1, n = 166) was prospectively defined, and clinical outcomes of patients at 6 months were compared with those of patients treated by conventional angioplasty and coronary beta-radiation (group 2, n = 712). At 6-month follow-up, there was a significant difference between groups 1 and 2 in target vessel revascularization (10.2% versus 16.6% respectively; p = 0.04) and in the incidence of major adverse clinical events (MACE) including death, myocardial infarction, and revascularization (10.8% versus 19.2%; p = 0.01). This observation was confirmed by a multivariate analysis indicating a lower risk for MACE at 6 months (odds ratio: 0.49; confidence intervals: 0.27 0.88; p = 0.02). Compared to conventional angioplasty, cutting balloon angioplasty prior to coronary beta-radiation with the Beta-Cath System seems to improve the 6-month clinical outcome in patients with in-stent restenosis.
目前,血管内近距离放射治疗是治疗支架内再狭窄的唯一有效方法。然而,与“边缘再狭窄”相关的“边缘遗漏”问题常被视为该技术的主要局限。防滑切割球囊有可能减少血管气压伤,这与放射源两端的低剂量照射一样,是解决“边缘遗漏”问题的前提条件。这项前瞻性研究旨在探讨切割球囊血管成形术联合近距离放射治疗对支架内再狭窄的疗效。欧洲辐射诺沃斯特(RENO)注册研究前瞻性地追踪了所有接受过使用Beta-Cath系统(比利时布鲁塞尔的诺沃斯特公司)进行冠状动脉β放射治疗,但未纳入随机放射试验的患者。前瞻性地定义了一组接受切割球囊血管成形术和冠状动脉β放射治疗的支架内再狭窄患者(第1组,n = 166),并将6个月时患者的临床结局与接受传统血管成形术和冠状动脉β放射治疗的患者(第2组,n = 712)进行比较。在6个月的随访中,第1组和第2组在靶血管再血管化方面(分别为10.2%对16.6%;p = 0.04)以及在包括死亡、心肌梗死和再血管化在内的主要不良临床事件(MACE)发生率方面(10.8%对19.2%;p = 0.01)存在显著差异。多变量分析证实了这一观察结果,表明6个月时发生MACE的风险较低(优势比:0.49;置信区间:0.27至0.88;p = 0.02)。与传统血管成形术相比,在使用Beta-Cath系统进行冠状动脉β放射治疗之前采用切割球囊血管成形术似乎能改善支架内再狭窄患者的6个月临床结局。