Lee Seung-Whan, Park Seong-Wook, Hong Myeong-Ki, Kim Young-Hak, Han Ki Hoon, Moon Dae Hyuk, Oh Seung Jun, Lee Cheol Whan, Kim Jae-Joong, Park Seung-Jung
Department of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University, Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Korea.
Am Heart J. 2005 Sep;150(3):577-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.10.011.
Rotational atherectomy (RA) and cutting balloon angioplasty (CBA) have been shown to effectively dilate in-stent restenosis (ISR). It is not known, however, which of these technique, when followed by beta-radiation, is more effective. Therefore, we performed a prospective randomized study comparing RA and CBA before beta-radiation therapy for diffuse ISR.
Patients with diffuse ISR were randomly assigned to receive RA (group 1, n = 58) or CBA (group 2, n = 55) before beta-radiation therapy with a rhenium 188-mercaptoacetyltriglycine-filled balloon, with the radiation dose being 18 Gy at a depth of 1.0 mm into the vessel wall. The primary end point was angiographic restenosis at 6 months, and the secondary end point was major adverse cardiac events (myocardial infarction, death, target lesion revascularization) at 9 months.
The 2 groups were similar in baseline characteristics. Mean lesion length was 21.0 +/- 11.2 mm in group 1 and 20.8 +/- 10.2 mm in group 2 (P = .77). Radiation was delivered successfully to all patients. We obtained 6-month angiographic follow-up in 90 patients (80%). The rates of angiographic restenosis were 14.9% (7 of 47) in group 1 and 14.0% (6 of 43) in group 2 (P = .89). No patient experienced myocardial infarction or death during the 9-month follow-up period. Rates of target lesion revascularization or major adverse cardiac events were 3.4% in group 1 and 3.6% in group 2 (P = .94) during the 9-month follow-up.
Either RA or CBA, followed by beta-radiation using a rhenium 188-mercaptoacetyltriglycine-filled balloon, is equally safe and effective for diffuse ISR in 6-month angiographic and 9-month clinical outcomes.
旋磨术(RA)和切割球囊血管成形术(CBA)已被证明能有效扩张支架内再狭窄(ISR)。然而,尚不清楚在这些技术之后进行β射线放射治疗时,哪种技术更有效。因此,我们进行了一项前瞻性随机研究,比较在β射线放射治疗弥漫性ISR之前使用RA和CBA的效果。
弥漫性ISR患者在使用填充铼188 - 巯基乙酰三甘氨酸的球囊进行β射线放射治疗前,被随机分配接受RA(第1组,n = 58)或CBA(第2组,n = 55),放射剂量为血管壁深度1.0 mm处18 Gy。主要终点是6个月时的血管造影再狭窄,次要终点是9个月时的主要不良心脏事件(心肌梗死、死亡、靶病变血管重建)。
两组的基线特征相似。第1组平均病变长度为21.0±11.2 mm,第2组为20.8±10.2 mm(P = 0.77)。所有患者均成功接受放射治疗。我们对90例患者(80%)进行了6个月的血管造影随访。第1组血管造影再狭窄率为14.9%(47例中的7例),第2组为14.0%(43例中的6例)(P = 0.89)。在9个月的随访期内,没有患者发生心肌梗死或死亡。在9个月的随访期间,第1组靶病变血管重建或主要不良心脏事件的发生率为3.4%,第2组为3.6%(P = 0.94)。
对于弥漫性ISR,无论是RA还是CBA,在使用填充铼188 - 巯基乙酰三甘氨酸的球囊进行β射线放射治疗后,在6个月血管造影和9个月临床结果方面同样安全有效。