Suppr超能文献

冠心病患者二级预防的医疗质量:通过技术加速研究有效应用(HEART)试验的结果

Quality of care for secondary prevention for patients with coronary heart disease: results of the Hastening the Effective Application of Research through Technology (HEART) trial.

作者信息

Goff David C, Gu Lin, Cantley Larry K, Sheedy David J, Cohen Stuart J

机构信息

Public Health Sciences and Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1063, USA.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 2003 Dec;146(6):1045-51. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8703(03)00522-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Effective therapies for reducing mortality rates in persons with coronary heart disease (CHD) remain underused. We report the results of an effectiveness trial of a quality improvement effort to increase the use of 3-hydroxy-3methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG CoA) reductase inhibitors, beta-blockers, and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in patients with CHD in a network-model managed-care setting.

METHODS

Patients with CHD were identified by searching a claims database. The use of therapies was assessed by linkage with a pharmacy database. An intervention, consisting of a guideline summary, peer comparison performance feedback, and patient specific chart reminders was evaluated in a randomized, practice-based effectiveness trial.

RESULTS

Data were available for >700 patients per year (1999-2002) in 131 practices. At baseline (1999), 55% of patients were receiving HMG CoA reductase inhibitors, 39% of patients were receiving beta-blockers, and 24% of patients were receiving ACE inhibitors. The use of all 3 types of medications increased steadily with time, with the exception of a decrease in the use of HMG CoA reductase inhibitors in the final year (2002). No difference in medication use was observed between randomized groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The observed pattern of care supports the contention that the quality of outpatient care for secondary prevention of CHD improved from 1999 to 2002 in this setting. The basis for the inconsistent pattern of use of HMG CoA reductase inhibitors is not certain, but may relate to concerns about toxicity. Centralized mailings of guideline summaries, performance feedback reports, and chart reminders had no observable impact on quality of care in this setting. More intensive intervention may be required to improve the quality of outpatient care for the secondary prevention of CHD.

摘要

背景

降低冠心病(CHD)患者死亡率的有效疗法仍未得到充分应用。我们报告了一项有效性试验的结果,该试验旨在通过质量改进措施,在网络模式的管理式医疗环境中,增加冠心病患者对3-羟基-3-甲基戊二酰辅酶A(HMG CoA)还原酶抑制剂、β受体阻滞剂和血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂的使用。

方法

通过检索索赔数据库识别冠心病患者。通过与药房数据库关联评估治疗方法的使用情况。在一项基于实践的随机有效性试验中,对由指南摘要、同行比较绩效反馈和患者特定图表提醒组成的干预措施进行了评估。

结果

1999 - 2002年期间,每年有超过700名患者的数据来自131个医疗机构。在基线时(1999年),55%的患者接受HMG CoA还原酶抑制剂治疗,39%的患者接受β受体阻滞剂治疗,24%的患者接受ACE抑制剂治疗。除最后一年(2002年)HMG CoA还原酶抑制剂的使用有所下降外,所有这三种药物的使用均随时间稳步增加。随机分组之间未观察到药物使用的差异。

结论

观察到的治疗模式支持这样的观点,即在这种情况下,1999年至2002年期间冠心病二级预防的门诊护理质量有所改善。HMG CoA还原酶抑制剂使用模式不一致的原因尚不确定,但可能与对毒性的担忧有关。在这种情况下,集中邮寄指南摘要、绩效反馈报告和图表提醒对护理质量没有明显影响。可能需要更强化的干预措施来提高冠心病二级预防的门诊护理质量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验