• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2000 - 2010年英格兰和威尔士降低冠心病死亡率治疗方法的经济分析

Economic analysis of treatments reducing coronary heart disease mortality in England and Wales, 2000-2010.

作者信息

Fidan D, Unal B, Critchley J, Capewell S

机构信息

Department of Public Health, University of Liverpool, Whelan Building, Quadrangle, Liverpool L69 3GB, UK.

出版信息

QJM. 2007 May;100(5):277-89. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcm020. Epub 2007 Apr 21.

DOI:10.1093/qjmed/hcm020
PMID:17449875
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Coronary heart disease (CHD) in the UK affects approximately 3 million people, with >100,000 deaths annually. Mortality rates have halved since the 1980s, but annual NHS treatment costs for CHD exceed 2 billion pounds.

AIM

To examine the cost-effectiveness of specific CHD treatments in England and Wales.

METHODS

The IMPACT CHD model was used to calculate the number of life-years gained (LYG) from specific cardiological interventions from 2000 to 2010. Cost-effectiveness ratios (costs per LYG) were generated for each specific intervention, stratified by age and sex. The robustness of the results was tested using sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

In 2000, medical and surgical treatments together prevented or postponed approximately 25,888 deaths in CHD patients aged 25-84 years, thus generating approximately 194,929 extra life-years between 2000 and 2010 (range 143,131-260,167). Aspirin and beta-blockers for secondary prevention following myocardial infarction or revascularisation, for angina and heart failure were highly cost-effective (< 1000 pounds per LYG). Other secondary prevention therapies, including cardiac rehabilitation, ACE inhibitors and statins, were reasonably cost-effective (1957 pounds, 3398 pounds and 4246 pounds per LYG, respectively), as were CABG surgery (3239 pounds-4601 pounds per LYG) and angioplasty (3845 pounds-5889 pounds per LYG). Primary angioplasty for myocardial infarction was intermediate (6054 pounds-12,057 pounds per LYG, according to age), and statins in primary prevention were much less cost-effective (27,828 pounds per LYG, reaching 69,373 pounds per LYG in men aged 35-44). Results were relatively consistent across a wide range of sensitivity analyses.

DISCUSSION

The cost-effectiveness ratios for standard CHD treatments varied by over 100-fold. Large amounts of NHS funding are being spent on relatively less cost-effective interventions, such as statins for primary prevention, angioplasty and CABG surgery. This merits debate.

摘要

背景

在英国,冠心病(CHD)影响着约300万人,每年有超过10万人死亡。自20世纪80年代以来,死亡率已减半,但英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)每年用于冠心病的治疗费用超过20亿英镑。

目的

研究英格兰和威尔士特定冠心病治疗方法的成本效益。

方法

使用IMPACT CHD模型计算2000年至2010年特定心脏干预措施所获得的生命年数(LYG)。针对每种特定干预措施,按年龄和性别分层生成成本效益比(每生命年的成本)。通过敏感性分析测试结果的稳健性。

结果

2000年,药物治疗和手术治疗共同预防或推迟了25888例25至84岁冠心病患者的死亡,从而在2000年至2010年间产生了约194929个额外的生命年(范围为143131至260167)。心肌梗死或血运重建、心绞痛和心力衰竭后用于二级预防的阿司匹林和β受体阻滞剂具有很高的成本效益(每生命年<1000英镑)。其他二级预防疗法,包括心脏康复、血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂和他汀类药物,成本效益合理(分别为每生命年1957英镑、3398英镑和4246英镑),冠状动脉搭桥术(CABG)手术(每生命年3239英镑至4601英镑)和血管成形术(每生命年3845英镑至5889英镑)也是如此。心肌梗死的直接血管成形术成本效益中等(根据年龄,每生命年6054英镑至12057英镑),一级预防中的他汀类药物成本效益则低得多(每生命年27828英镑,在35至44岁男性中达到每生命年69373英镑)。在广泛的敏感性分析中,结果相对一致。

讨论

标准冠心病治疗的成本效益比相差超过100倍。大量的NHS资金被用于成本效益相对较低的干预措施,如一级预防中的他汀类药物、血管成形术和CABG手术。这值得探讨。

相似文献

1
Economic analysis of treatments reducing coronary heart disease mortality in England and Wales, 2000-2010.2000 - 2010年英格兰和威尔士降低冠心病死亡率治疗方法的经济分析
QJM. 2007 May;100(5):277-89. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcm020. Epub 2007 Apr 21.
2
Results of a Markov model analysis to assess the cost-effectiveness of statin therapy for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in Korea: the Korean Individual-Microsimulation Model for Cardiovascular Health Interventions.韩国心血管健康干预个体化微观模拟模型评估韩国人群进行心血管疾病一级预防应用他汀类药物治疗的成本效果分析结果
Clin Ther. 2009 Dec;31(12):2919-30; discussion 2916-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.12.013.
3
The population mortality benefits of maximizing the number of eligible patients receiving appropriate cardiology treatments in Ireland.在爱尔兰,使接受适当心脏病治疗的符合条件患者数量最大化所带来的人口死亡率益处。
QJM. 2006 Aug;99(8):523-30. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcl072. Epub 2006 Jul 22.
4
Quality of care for secondary prevention for patients with coronary heart disease: results of the Hastening the Effective Application of Research through Technology (HEART) trial.冠心病患者二级预防的医疗质量:通过技术加速研究有效应用(HEART)试验的结果
Am Heart J. 2003 Dec;146(6):1045-51. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8703(03)00522-2.
5
Cost effectiveness of statins in coronary heart disease.他汀类药物在冠心病治疗中的成本效益
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005 Nov;59(11):927-33. doi: 10.1136/jech.2005.034900.
6
Cost-effectiveness of screening for albuminuria with subsequent fosinopril treatment to prevent cardiovascular events: A pharmacoeconomic analysis linked to the prevention of renal and vascular endstage disease (PREVEND) study and the prevention of renal and vascular endstage disease intervention trial (PREVEND IT).通过后续福辛普利治疗筛查蛋白尿以预防心血管事件的成本效益:一项与预防肾脏和血管终末期疾病(PREVEND)研究及预防肾脏和血管终末期疾病干预试验(PREVEND IT)相关的药物经济学分析。
Clin Ther. 2006 Mar;28(3):432-44. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.03.012.
7
Cost-effectiveness of HMG coenzyme reductase inhibitors; whom to treat?HMG辅酶还原酶抑制剂的成本效益;该治疗谁?
Eur Heart J. 2001 May;22(9):751-61. doi: 10.1053/euhj.2000.2308.
8
Patients undergoing coronary revascularisation: a missed opportunity for secondary prevention?接受冠状动脉血运重建的患者:二级预防的错失良机?
Postgrad Med J. 2005 Jun;81(956):401-3. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2004.023861.
9
Use and cost of branded and generic drugs in patients with coronary heart disease--results from a prospective survey of 1008 patients in two London hospitals.冠心病患者使用品牌药和仿制药的情况——来自伦敦两家医院 1008 例患者前瞻性调查的结果。
QJM. 2009 Dec;102(12):843-9. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcp127. Epub 2009 Oct 14.
10
Cost effectiveness of statin therapy for the primary prevention of coronary heart disease.他汀类药物治疗对冠心病一级预防的成本效益
Ir Med J. 2006 May;99(5):144-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Aneurysm CaRe: a randomized controlled feasibility trial of cardiac rehabilitation versus standard care after aortic aneurysm repair.动脉瘤康复治疗:一项关于主动脉瘤修复术后心脏康复与标准护理对比的随机对照可行性试验。
Br J Surg. 2025 May 31;112(6). doi: 10.1093/bjs/znaf126.
2
Impact of cardiac rehabilitation programs on left ventricular remodeling after acute myocardial infarction: Study Protocol Clinical Trial (SPIRIT Compliant).心脏康复计划对急性心肌梗死后左心室重构的影响:研究方案 临床试验(符合SPIRIT标准)
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Apr;99(16):e19759. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019759.
3
Cost-effectiveness of coronary artery bypass graft and percutaneous coronary intervention compared to medical therapy in patients with coronary artery disease: a systematic review.
冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与药物治疗相比在冠状动脉疾病患者中的成本效益:系统评价。
Heart Fail Rev. 2019 Nov;24(6):967-975. doi: 10.1007/s10741-019-09811-3.
4
Prevention of postoperative pulmonary complications through preoperative physiotherapy interventions in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft: literature review.冠状动脉搭桥术患者术前物理治疗干预预防术后肺部并发症:文献综述
J Phys Ther Sci. 2018 Aug;30(8):1034-1038. doi: 10.1589/jpts.30.1034. Epub 2018 Jul 24.
5
Aerobic exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation in Chinese patients with coronary heart disease: study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial.中国冠心病患者基于有氧运动的心脏康复:一项试点随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2018 Jul 9;19(1):363. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2771-8.
6
Inequalities in access to cardiac rehabilitation after an acute coronary syndrome: the EPiHeart cohort.急性冠状动脉综合征后心脏康复可及性的不平等:EPiHeart队列研究
BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 3;8(1):e018934. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018934.
7
Building consensus for provision of breathlessness rehabilitation for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and chronic heart failure.就为慢性阻塞性肺疾病和慢性心力衰竭患者提供呼吸康复达成共识。
Chron Respir Dis. 2016 Aug;13(3):229-39. doi: 10.1177/1479972316642363. Epub 2016 Apr 12.
8
Does the timing of cardiac rehabilitation impact fitness outcomes? An observational analysis.心脏康复的时机是否会影响体能结果?一项观察性分析。
Open Heart. 2016 Feb 8;3(1):e000369. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2015-000369. eCollection 2016.
9
Observational study of the relationship between volume and outcomes using data from the National Audit of Cardiac Rehabilitation.利用国家心脏康复审计数据对容量与预后之间关系的观察性研究。
Open Heart. 2015 Oct 30;2(1):e000304. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2015-000304. eCollection 2015.
10
Quantifying the Socio-Economic Benefits of Reducing Industrial Dietary Trans Fats: Modelling Study.量化减少工业生产膳食反式脂肪的社会经济效益:建模研究
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 6;10(8):e0132524. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132524. eCollection 2015.