Bygrave S, Legg S J, Myers S, Llewellyn M
Centre for Human Sciences, QinetiQ, Farnborough, Hampshire, UK.
Ergonomics. 2004 Feb 26;47(3):324-9. doi: 10.1080/0014013031000157869.
Carrying loads close to the trunk with a backpack causes a restrictive type of change in lung function in which Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) and Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 s (FEV1) are reduced without a corresponding decrement in the FEV1.FVC( - 1) %. It is not known whether this is due to the weight of the load acting on the chest or to the tightness of fit of the shoulder and chest straps and waist belt of the pack harness. This study examined FVC, FEV1, FEV1.FVC( - 1) %, peak expiratory flow (PEF), forced expiratory flow between 0.2 and 1.2 s (FEF0.2 - 1.2) after the start of expiration and between 25 and 75% of each FVC (FEF25 - 75%) in 12 healthy males wearing a 15 kg backpack in which the shoulder and chest straps and hip belt were loosened by 3 cm from a 'comfort fit' to achieve a 'loose pack' fit (LPF) and tightened by 3 cm from CF to achieve a 'tight pack' fit (TPF). In comparison with the control condition of no pack, a loose pack fit significantly reduced FVC (by 3.6%, p < 0.01), FEV1 (by 4.3%, p < 0.01) and FEF25 - 75% (by 8.4%, p < 0.01). A tight pack fit significantly reduced FVC (by 8.1%, p < 0.01) and FEV1 (by 9.1%, p < 0.001). It also significantly reduced FEF0.2 - 1.2 (by 7.3%, p < 0.05) and FEF25 - 75% (by 21%, p < 0.01). In comparison with a loose pack fit, the tight pack fit was associated with a significantly lower FVC (by 4.6%, p < 0.01), FEV1 (by 5.0%, p < 0.01), FEF25 - 75% (by 13.8%, p < 0.01) and a fall in FEF0.2 - 1.2 (by 5.5%). The latter was approaching significance (p = 0.077). There were no significant changes in FEV1.FVC( - 1)% and PEF. It is concluded that tightening the fit of a backpack significantly affects lung function in a manner that is typical of a restrictive change in lung function and is very similar in pattern to that of wearing a loosely fitted loaded backpack. The effect of tightness of fit is additional to that due to the weight of the load alone and may also reduce expiratory flow at low lung volumes.
背着背包将重物靠近躯干会导致肺功能出现一种限制性改变,即用力肺活量(FVC)和第1秒用力呼气量(FEV1)降低,而FEV1/FVC(-1)%却没有相应下降。目前尚不清楚这是由于作用在胸部的负荷重量,还是背包背带的肩带、胸带和腰带的贴合紧度所致。本研究检测了12名健康男性在背负一个15千克背包时的FVC、FEV1、FEV1/FVC(-1)%、呼气峰值流速(PEF)、呼气开始后0.2至1.2秒的用力呼气流量(FEF0.2 - 1.2)以及每个FVC的25%至75%之间的用力呼气流量(FEF25 - 75%)。该背包的肩带、胸带和腰带从“舒适贴合”状态松开3厘米以达到“宽松背包”贴合(LPF),并从舒适贴合状态收紧3厘米以达到“紧密背包”贴合(TPF)。与不背背包的对照状态相比,宽松背包贴合显著降低了FVC(降低3.6%,p < 0.01)、FEV1(降低4.3%,p < 0.01)和FEF25 - 75%(降低8.4%,p < 0.01)。紧密背包贴合显著降低了FVC(降低8.1%,p < 0.01)和FEV1(降低9.1%,p < 0.001)。它还显著降低了FEF0.2 - 1.2(降低7.3%,p < 0.05)和FEF25 - 75%(降低21%,p < 0.01)。与宽松背包贴合相比,紧密背包贴合导致FVC显著降低(降低4.6%,p < 0.01)、FEV1显著降低(降低5.0%,p < 0.01)、FEF25 - 75%显著降低(降低13.8%,p < 0.01)以及FEF0.2 - 1.2下降(降低5.5%)。后者接近显著水平(p = 0.077)。FEV1/FVC(-1)%和PEF没有显著变化。研究得出结论,收紧背包的贴合度会以一种典型的肺功能限制性改变的方式显著影响肺功能,并且其模式与背负宽松负载背包非常相似。贴合度紧的影响除了单独由负荷重量引起的影响之外,还可能降低低肺容量时的呼气流量。