Cheek Eric R, Fast Vladimir G
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala 35294, USA.
Circ Res. 2004 Feb 6;94(2):208-14. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000111526.69133.DE. Epub 2003 Dec 11.
Defibrillation shocks induce nonlinear changes of transmembrane potential (DeltaVm) that determine the outcome of defibrillation. As shown earlier, strong shocks applied during action potential plateau cause nonmonotonic negative DeltaVm, where an initial hyperpolarization is followed by Vm shift to a more positive level. The biphasic negative DeltaVm can be attributable to (1) an inward ionic current or (2) membrane electroporation. These hypotheses were tested in cell cultures by measuring the effects of ionic channel blockers on DeltaVm and measuring uptake of membrane-impermeable dye. Experiments were performed in cell strands (width approximately 0.8 mm) produced using a technique of patterned cell growth. Uniform-field shocks were applied during the action potential plateau, and DeltaVm was measured by optical mapping. Shock-induced negative DeltaVm exhibited a biphasic shape starting at a shock strength of approximately 15 V/cm when estimated peak DeltaV-m was approximately -180 mV; positive DeltaVm remained monophasic. Application of a series of shocks with a strength of 23+/-1 V/cm resulted in uptake of membrane-impermeable dye propidium iodide. Dye uptake was restricted to the anodal side of strands with the largest negative DeltaVm, indicating the occurrence of membrane electroporation at these locations. The occurrence of biphasic negative DeltaVm was also paralleled with after-shock elevation of diastolic Vm. Inhibition of I(f) and I(K1) currents that are active at large negative potentials by CsCl and BaCl2, respectively, did not affect DeltaVm, indicating that these currents were not responsible for biphasic DeltaVm. These results provide evidence that the biphasic shape of DeltaVm at sites of shock-induced hyperpolarization is caused by membrane electroporation.
除颤电击会引起跨膜电位(ΔVm)的非线性变化,这决定了除颤的结果。如前所示,在动作电位平台期施加的强电击会导致非单调的负向ΔVm,即初始超极化后Vm会向更正的水平偏移。双相负向ΔVm可能归因于(1)内向离子电流或(2)膜电穿孔。通过测量离子通道阻滞剂对ΔVm的影响以及测量膜不可渗透染料的摄取,在细胞培养物中对这些假设进行了测试。实验在使用图案化细胞生长技术产生的细胞条带(宽度约0.8毫米)中进行。在动作电位平台期施加均匀场电击,并通过光学映射测量ΔVm。当估计的峰值ΔV-m约为-180 mV时,电击诱导的负向ΔVm在约15 V/cm的电击强度下开始呈现双相形状;正向ΔVm保持单相。施加一系列强度为23±1 V/cm的电击导致膜不可渗透染料碘化丙啶的摄取。染料摄取仅限于具有最大负向ΔVm的条带的阳极侧,表明在这些位置发生了膜电穿孔。双相负向ΔVm的出现也与舒张期Vm的电击后升高同时发生。分别用CsCl和BaCl2抑制在大的负电位下活跃的I(f)和I(K1)电流,并不影响ΔVm,表明这些电流与双相ΔVm无关。这些结果提供了证据,表明电击诱导超极化部位的ΔVm双相形状是由膜电穿孔引起的。