Suppr超能文献

内皮素-1和血管紧张素II在实验性缺血后急性肾衰竭中的相对作用

Relative roles of endothelin-1 and angiotensin II in experimental post-ischaemic acute renal failure.

作者信息

Jerkić Mirjana, Miloradović Zoran, Jovović Durddica, Mihailović-Stanojević Nevena, Elena Juan Vicente Rivas, Nastić-Mirić Danica, Grujić-Adanja Gordana, Rodríguez-Barbero Alicia, Marković-Lipkovski Jasmina, Vojvodić Srećko B, Manero Marta Vicens, Prieto Marta Pérez, López-Novoa José Miguel

机构信息

Instituto Reina Sofía de Investigación Nefrológica, Departamento de Fisiología y Farmacología, Universidad de Salamanca, Avenida Campo Charro s/n, 37007 Salamanca, Spain.

出版信息

Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2004 Jan;19(1):83-94. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfg521.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The relative roles of endothelin (ET)-1 and angiotensin (ANG) II in post-ischaemic acute renal failure (ARF) have not been fully established so far. With the aim of contributing to this goal, we assessed in this study the effect of ANG II and ET-1 blockade on the course of post-ischaemic-ARF.

METHODS

Anaesthetized Wistar rats received i.v. either bosentan (a dual ET receptor antagonist; 10 mg/kg body weight) or losartan [ANG II type 1 (AT(1)) receptor antagonist; 5 or 10 mg/kg body weight] or both, 20 min before, during and 20 min after ischaemia. Rats in the control group received the vehicle via the same route. Survival and renal function were monitored up to 8 days after the ischaemic challenge, while haemodynamic parameters were measured 24 h after ARF.

RESULTS

Our results demonstrate that bosentan treatment has a more beneficial effect on experimental ARF than losartan. The survival rate was remarkably higher in bosentan-treated rats than in both rat groups treated with losartan. In the ARF group treated with bosentan, renal blood flow (RBF) was increased by 129% in comparison with the untreated ARF group, whereas in the losartan-treated ARF groups, RBF was only approximately 35 or 38% higher than in control ARF rats. The glomerular filtration rate was markedly higher in bosentan-treated rats than in all other ARF groups on the first and second day after ischaemia. Tubular cell injury was less severe in bosentan-treated rats than in the control ARF rats, but in losartan-treated groups it was similar to that in the ARF group. Concurrent blockade of both ET and AT(1) receptors did not improve ARF because this treatment induced a marked decrease in blood pressure.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that ET-1 blockade is more efficient in improving the early course of post-ischaemic renal injury than ANG II inhibition, and that blockade of ET-1 might be effective in prophylaxis of ischaemic ARF.

摘要

背景

内皮素(ET)-1和血管紧张素(ANG)II在缺血后急性肾衰竭(ARF)中的相对作用迄今尚未完全明确。为了有助于实现这一目标,我们在本研究中评估了ANG II和ET-1阻断对缺血后ARF病程的影响。

方法

麻醉的Wistar大鼠在缺血前20分钟、缺血期间及缺血后20分钟静脉注射波生坦(一种双重ET受体拮抗剂;10毫克/千克体重)或氯沙坦[ANG II 1型(AT(1))受体拮抗剂;5或10毫克/千克体重]或两者。对照组大鼠通过相同途径接受溶剂。在缺血性刺激后长达8天监测存活率和肾功能,而在ARF后24小时测量血流动力学参数。

结果

我们的结果表明,波生坦治疗对实验性ARF的效果比氯沙坦更有益。波生坦治疗的大鼠存活率明显高于氯沙坦治疗的两个大鼠组。在波生坦治疗的ARF组中,肾血流量(RBF)与未治疗的ARF组相比增加了129%,而在氯沙坦治疗的ARF组中,RBF仅比对照ARF大鼠高约35%或38%。在缺血后第一天和第二天,波生坦治疗的大鼠肾小球滤过率明显高于所有其他ARF组。波生坦治疗的大鼠肾小管细胞损伤比对照ARF大鼠轻,但在氯沙坦治疗组中与ARF组相似。同时阻断ET和AT(1)受体并不能改善ARF,因为这种治疗导致血压明显下降。

结论

这些结果表明,ET-1阻断在改善缺血后肾损伤的早期病程方面比ANG II抑制更有效,并且ET-1阻断可能对缺血性ARF的预防有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验