Gilbert William M, Hicks Shauna M, Boe Nina M, Danielsen Beate
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California, USA.
Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Nov;102(5 Pt 1):911-7. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(03)00809-3.
To examine the population-based pregnancy outcomes associated with vaginal breech delivery.
A retrospective, population-based cohort study of all term (greater than 37 weeks' gestation), normal birth weight (2.5-3.8 kg), nonanomalous newborns in California, from January 1, 1991 to December 31, 1999 was performed. Neonatal mortality and major neonatal morbidity were compared by route of delivery for cephalic (3,271,092) and breech (100,730) presentations.
More than 3.2 million singleton term newborns were identified during the study period, with 100,667 (3%) in breech presentation at the time of delivery. Of these, 4952 women (4.9%) had vaginal breech delivery, whereas 60,418 women delivered by cesarean without labor, and 35,297 women underwent cesarean in labor. Breech vaginal delivery in nulliparous women was associated with increased neonatal mortality (odds ratio [OR] 9.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.3, 25.6) and morbidity (asphyxia: OR 5.7, 95% CI 4.5, 7.3; brachial plexus injury: OR 33.9, 95% CI 15.2, 76.1; and birth trauma: OR 5.8, 95% CI 4.7, 7.1) compared with breech delivery by prelabor cesarean in nulliparous women. In breech-presenting women with one prior vaginal delivery, neonatal mortality was not different between groups, but morbidities (asphyxia: OR 3.9, 95% CI 3.0, 5.1; brachial plexus injury: OR 22.4, 95% CI 9.9, 50.5; and birth trauma: OR 4.2, 95% CI 3.4, 5.3) remained increased for vaginal compared with cesarean delivery.
The "normal" term breech fetus, when delivered vaginally, had significantly increased neonatal mortality (in nulliparous women) and morbidity (all breech deliveries), when compared with the breech fetus delivered by cesarean, which suggests that these patients might best be delivered by cesarean to avoid these adverse outcomes.
研究基于人群的臀位阴道分娩相关的妊娠结局。
对1991年1月1日至1999年12月31日加利福尼亚州所有足月(妊娠大于37周)、出生体重正常(2.5 - 3.8千克)、无异常的新生儿进行一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究。通过分娩途径比较头位(3,271,092例)和臀位(100,730例)分娩的新生儿死亡率和主要新生儿发病率。
在研究期间共识别出超过320万名单胎足月新生儿,其中100,667例(3%)在分娩时为臀位。其中,4952名女性(4.9%)进行了臀位阴道分娩,而60,418名女性未经产程行剖宫产,35,297名女性在产程中进行了剖宫产。与未产程剖宫产的初产妇臀位分娩相比,初产妇臀位阴道分娩与新生儿死亡率增加(比值比[OR] 9.2,95%置信区间[CI] 3.3, 25.6)和发病率增加(窒息:OR 5.7,95% CI 4.5, 7.3;臂丛神经损伤:OR 33.9,95% CI 15.2, 76.1;产伤:OR 5.8,95% CI 4.7, 7.1)相关。在有一次既往阴道分娩史的臀位产妇中,两组间新生儿死亡率无差异,但与剖宫产相比,阴道分娩的发病率(窒息:OR 3.9,95% CI 3.0, 5.1;臂丛神经损伤:OR 22.4,95% CI 9.9, 50.5;产伤:OR 4.2,95% CI 3.4, 5.3)仍然增加。
与剖宫产分娩的臀位胎儿相比,“正常”足月臀位胎儿经阴道分娩时,新生儿死亡率(初产妇中)和发病率(所有臀位分娩)显著增加,这表明这些患者最好通过剖宫产分娩以避免这些不良结局。