Babović Ivana, Plesiinac Snezana, Radojicić Zoran, Opalić Jasna, Argirović Rajka, Mladenović-Bogdanović Zorica, Plećas Darko
Klinicki centar Srbije, Institut za ginekologiju i akuserstvo, Beograd, Srbija.
Vojnosanit Pregl. 2010 Oct;67(10):807-11. doi: 10.2298/vsp1010807b.
BACKGROUND/AIM: The optimal method of delivery for breech presentation at term still remains a matter of controversy. This is probably due to the fact that the skills of vaginal breech delivery are being lost. The aim of this study was to examine risk factors: mother's age, parity, labor's duration, estimated neonatal birth weight for the mode of breech presentation delivery at term as well as the influence of the delivery mode on neonatal outcome.
A retrospective study of 401 terms (more than 37 week's gestation) breech deliveries at the Institute of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Belgrade, from 2007 to 2008 was made. The following groups with respect to mode of delivery were included: the group I - vaginal delivery (VD) in 139 patients; the group II - urgent cesarean section (UCS) in 128 patients; and the group III - elective cesarean section (ECS) in 134 patients. Mother's age, parity, duration of VD, neonatal birth weight (BW), the Apgar score at 5th minute, and duration of stay in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) were determined. Neonatal mortality and major neonatal morbidity were compared according to the route of delivery. Fetuses and neonates with hemolytic disease and fetal and neonatal anomalies were excluded from the study. For statistical analyses we performed Student's t test, Chi2 likelihood ratio, Kruskall-Wallis test, Mann Whitney test, and ANOVA.
The mean age of patients in the group I was 28.29 +/- 4.97 years, in the group II 29.68 +/- 5.92 years and in the group III 30.06 +/- 5.41 years. Difference in mother's age between the group I and III was significant (p = 0.022). In the group III there were 73.9% nuliparous similarly to the group II (73.4%). We performed ECS in 54.6% of the nuliparous older than 35 years, and 54.4% multiparous younger than 35 years were delivered by VD. The use of oxytocin for stimulation of vaginal labor was not associated with its duration (p = 0.706). Lowset maneuver was performed in 88.5% of the VD. Mean BW of neonates was 3189.93 +/- 399.42 g in the VD group, 3218.59 +/- 517.71 g in the UCS and 3427.99 +/- 460.04 g in the ECS group. Neonates of the estimated BW below 2500 g were delivered by UCS in 5.5% cases, vaginally in 3.6% cases and by ECS in 2.2% cases. Neonates of the estimated BW above 3 500 g were delivered by ECS in 44.8% cases, vaginally in 23.0% cases and by UCS in 30.5% cases. There was a statistically significant difference between the VD and UCS groups (p = 0.004). Neonatal well-being was diagnosed in 75.5% of the neonates in the VD group, in 72.4% of the neonates in the ECS group, and in 65.5% of the neonates in the UCS group. The Apgar score at 5th min > 8 was observed in 96% of the neonates in the VD group, in 97.5% of the neonantes in the ECS group and in 94.5% of the neonates in the UCS group. In breech presentation, perinatal asphyxia remained increased in the VD group by 9.4% as compared with the UCS group, 5.5% (p = 0.001) and the ECS group, 3.0% (p = 0.016). Neonates stayed in NICU significantly longer after UCS compared with VD or ECS (7.21 +/- 10.74 days vs 3.99 +/- 1.33 days and 5.34 +/- 2.88 days, respectively; p = 0.001 and p = 0.037, respectively). There was no diagnosed intracranial hemorrhage, brachial plexus injury and birth trauma in any groups. Also, there was no early neonatal death.
For breech presentation elective cesarean section remains the major delivery method in nuliparous older than 35 years, while vaginal delivery is considered to be the method of choice in younger multiparous with ultrasonographically estimated neonatal birth weight 2500-3500 grams.
背景/目的:足月臀位分娩的最佳方式仍存在争议。这可能是由于阴道臀位分娩的技能正在失传。本研究的目的是探讨足月臀位分娩方式的危险因素:母亲年龄、产次、产程、估计新生儿出生体重,以及分娩方式对新生儿结局的影响。
对2007年至2008年在贝尔格莱德妇产科研究所进行的401例足月(妊娠超过37周)臀位分娩进行回顾性研究。根据分娩方式分为以下几组:第一组——139例患者经阴道分娩(VD);第二组——128例患者行急诊剖宫产(UCS);第三组——134例患者行择期剖宫产(ECS)。测定母亲年龄、产次、VD持续时间、新生儿出生体重(BW)、第5分钟Apgar评分以及新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)住院时间。根据分娩途径比较新生儿死亡率和主要新生儿发病率。研究排除患有溶血病的胎儿和新生儿以及胎儿和新生儿畸形。为进行统计分析,我们进行了学生t检验、卡方似然比检验、克鲁斯卡尔-沃利斯检验、曼-惠特尼检验和方差分析。
第一组患者的平均年龄为28.29±4.97岁,第二组为29.68±5.92岁,第三组为30.06±5.41岁。第一组和第三组母亲年龄差异有统计学意义(p = 0.022)。第三组初产妇占73.9%,与第二组(73.4%)相似。35岁以上初产妇中54.6%行ECS,35岁以下经产妇中54.4%经阴道分娩。使用缩宫素刺激阴道分娩与产程无关(p = 0.706)。88.5%的VD采用低位手法。VD组新生儿平均BW为3189.93±399.42g,UCS组为3218.59±517.71g,ECS组为3427.99±460.04g。估计BW低于2500g的新生儿,5.5%通过UCS分娩,3.6%经阴道分娩,2.2%通过ECS分娩。估计BW高于3500g的新生儿,44.8%通过ECS分娩,23.0%经阴道分娩,30.5%通过UCS分娩。VD组和UCS组之间有统计学显著差异(p = 0.004)。VD组75.5%的新生儿、ECS组72.4%的新生儿和UCS组65.5%的新生儿被诊断为新生儿状况良好。VD组96%的新生儿、ECS组97.5%的新生儿和UCS组94.先5%的新生儿第5分钟Apgar评分>8。臀位分娩时,VD组围产期窒息率比UCS组高9.4%(p = 0.001),比ECS组高3.0%(p = 0.016)。与VD或ECS相比,UCS后新生儿在NICU的停留时间显著更长(分别为7.21±10.74天、3.99±1.33天和5.34±2.88天;p分别为0.001和0.037)。任何组均未诊断出颅内出血、臂丛神经损伤和产伤。此外,也没有早期新生儿死亡。
对于臀位分娩,35岁以上初产妇择期剖宫产仍是主要分娩方式,而超声估计新生儿出生体重在2500 - 3500克的年轻经产妇,阴道分娩被认为是首选方式。