Suppr超能文献

Three different subsite classification systems for carcinomas in the proximity of the GEJ, but is it all one disease?

作者信息

Dolan Kevin, Morris Anthony I, Gosney John R, Field John K, Sutton Robert

机构信息

Molecular Genetics and Oncology Group, University of Liverpool, Department of Surgery, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, UK.

出版信息

J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004 Jan;19(1):24-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2004.03280.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Currently there are three different subsite classification systems for carcinomas in the region of the gastroesophaeal junction (GEJ), namely ICD-O, Munich and Liverpool. The aim of the present study was to compare clinicoepidemiological, pathological and molecular features of adenocarcinomas in the proximity of the GEJ, classified according to their position with respect to the GEJ initially, and then classified according to ICD-O, Munich and Liverpool classifications.

METHODS

Forty-seven adenocarcinomas in the proximity of the GEJ were subdivided into groups 1 (exclusively within esophagus), 2 (mainly within esophagus but extending distally across GEJ), 3 (equally present in esophagus and stomach) or 4 (mainly in stomach but extending proximally across GEJ), and analysis of their clinicoepidemiological, pathological and molecular features was performed. Molecular characterization included loss of heterozygosity (LOH) and microsatellite instability analyses.

RESULTS

Group 3 carcinomas were younger than other carcinomas in the proximity of the GEJ, but otherwise these carcinomas were similar in their clinicoepidemiological, pathological and molecular features. There were no significant differences between esophageal (groups 1 and 2) and gastric (groups 3 and 4) carcinomas as classified by ICD-O. Munich types I (groups 1 and 2), II (group 3) and III (group 4) carcinomas of the GEJ were also similar. LOH at the site of the Rb tumor suppressor gene and at 17p11.1-p12 was more common in GEJ (groups 2, 3 and 4) than lower third (group 1) esophageal carcinomas classified according to the Liverpool system.

CONCLUSION

Overall, adenocarcinomas of the lower esophagus and adenocarcinomas involving the GEJ have similar clinicoepidemiological, pathological and molecular features no matter which subsite classification is used, adding further evidence that they represent the same disease.

摘要

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验