Suppr超能文献

印度加尔各答采用醋酸目视检查和细胞学检查早期发现宫颈肿瘤

Visual inspection with acetic acid and cytology in the early detection of cervical neoplasia in Kolkata, India.

作者信息

Basu P S, Sankaranarayanan R, Mandal R, Roy C, Das P, Choudhury D, Bhattacharya D, Chatterjee R, Dutta K, Barik S, Tsu V, Chakrabarti R N, Siddiqi M

机构信息

Chittaranjan National Cancer Institute, Kolkata, India.

出版信息

Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2003 Sep-Oct;13(5):626-32. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1438.2003.13394.x.

Abstract

Visual inspection of the cervix after application of 3-5% acetic acid (VIA) is a potential alternative to cytology for screening in low-resource countries. The present study evaluated the performance of VIA, magnified visual inspection after application of acetic acid (VIAM), and cytology in the detection of high-grade cervical cancer precursor lesions in Kolkata (Calcutta) and suburbs in eastern India. Trained health workers with college education concurrently screened 5881 women aged 30-64 years with VIA, VIAM, and conventional cervical cytology. Detection of well-defined, opaque acetowhite lesions close to the squamocolumnar junction; well-defined, circumorificial acetowhite lesions; or dense acetowhitening of ulceroproliferative growth on the cervix constituted a positive VIA or VIAM. Cytology was considered positive if reported as mild dysplasia or worse lesions. All screened women (N = 5881) were evaluated by colposcopy, and biopsies were directed in those with colposcopic abnormalities (N = 1052, 17.9%). The final diagnosis was based on histology (if biopsies had been taken) or colposcopic findings, which allowed direct estimation of sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values. Moderate or severe dysplasia or carcinoma in situ (CIN 2-3 disease) was considered as true positive disease for the calculation of sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of screening tests. 18.7%, 17.7% and 8.2% of the women tested positive for VIA, VIAM, and cytology. One hundred twenty two women had a final diagnosis of CIN 2-3 lesions. The sensitivities of VIA and VIAM to detect CIN 2-3 lesions were 55.7% and 60.7%, respectively; the specificities were 82.1% and 83.2%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of cytology were 29.5% and 92.3%, respectively. All the tests were associated with negative predictive values above 98%. VIA and VIAM had significantly higher sensitivity than cytology in our study; the specificity of cytology was higher than that of VIA and VIAM.

摘要

在资源匮乏国家,应用3%-5%醋酸后进行宫颈视诊(VIA)可能是一种替代细胞学检查的筛查方法。本研究评估了VIA、应用醋酸后放大宫颈视诊(VIAM)以及细胞学检查在印度东部加尔各答及其郊区检测高级别宫颈癌前病变的性能。受过大学教育的训练有素的卫生工作者同时使用VIA、VIAM和传统宫颈细胞学方法对5881名年龄在30-64岁的女性进行筛查。在鳞柱交界附近检测到边界清晰、不透明的醋酸白色病变;边界清晰的环形醋酸白色病变;或宫颈上溃疡增生性肿物的致密醋酸白色变构成VIA或VIAM阳性。如果细胞学报告为轻度发育异常或更严重的病变,则认为是阳性。所有接受筛查的女性(N = 5881)均接受阴道镜检查评估,对阴道镜检查异常的女性(N = 1052,17.9%)进行活检。最终诊断基于组织学(如果已进行活检)或阴道镜检查结果,这使得能够直接估计敏感性、特异性和预测值。在计算筛查试验的敏感性、特异性和预测值时,中度或重度发育异常或原位癌(CIN 2-3病变)被视为真正的阳性疾病。18.7%、17.7%和8.2%的女性VIA、VIAM和细胞学检查呈阳性。122名女性最终诊断为CIN 2-3病变。VIA和VIAM检测CIN 2-3病变的敏感性分别为55.7%和60.7%;特异性分别为82.1%和83.2%。细胞学检查的敏感性和特异性分别为29.5%和92.3%。所有检测的阴性预测值均高于98%。在我们的研究中,VIA和VIAM的敏感性显著高于细胞学检查;细胞学检查的特异性高于VIA和VIAM。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验