Suppr超能文献

[谁应该决定医疗康复申请?对医疗保健协同行动咨询委员会提案的批判性重新评估]

[Who should decide on applications for medical rehabilitation? A critical reappraisal of the proposals of the Advisory Board on Concerted Action in Health Care].

作者信息

van den Bussche H, Dunkelberg S

机构信息

Institut für Allgemeinmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg.

出版信息

Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2003 Dec;42(6):350-3. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-812544.

Abstract

Summary. In Germany the allocation of rehabilitation services depends on a decision of one of the social insurance funds. This decision is taken on the basis of an assessment of the application file by a physician of the fund. The general practitioner who may be the best informed professional as to the patients' disability, has no decision power in this allocation process. In 2001, however, the prestigious Advisory Board to the Ministry of Health proposed to leave the allocation to the general practitioner or another physician in office practice, thus restricting the role of the fund to verifying the appropriateness of the decision of the GP. This proposal is reviewed on the basis of the results of a survey among all general practitioners in the four Länder of Hamburg, Schleswig-Holstein, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern and Sachsen-Anhalt (n = 2110; response rate of 46%) done between 1999 and 2001. Furthermore, several steps and measures are proposed in view of increasing the involvement of the GP in the allocation process and of improving the communication between the funds and the general practitioners.

摘要

总结。在德国,康复服务的分配取决于其中一家社会保险基金的决定。该决定是在基金的一名医生对申请文件进行评估的基础上做出的。全科医生可能是对患者残疾情况了解最多的专业人员,但在这一分配过程中没有决定权。然而,2001年,卫生部颇具声望的顾问委员会提议将分配工作交给全科医生或在职的其他医生,从而将基金的作用限制在核实全科医生决定的适当性上。根据1999年至2001年期间对汉堡、石勒苏益格-荷尔斯泰因、梅克伦堡-前波美拉尼亚和萨克森-安哈尔特四个州的所有全科医生进行的一项调查(n = 2110;回复率为46%)结果,对该提议进行了审查。此外,鉴于要增加全科医生在分配过程中的参与度并改善基金与全科医生之间的沟通,还提出了若干步骤和措施。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验