LaVeist Thomas A, Arthur Melanie, Morgan Athol, Plantholt Stephen, Rubinstein Michael
Johns Hopkins University, USA.
Med Care Res Rev. 2003 Dec;60(4):453-67; discussion 496-508. doi: 10.1177/1077558703255685.
The authors examine three hypotheses regarding race differences in utilization of coronary angiography (CA): (1) patients with a cardiology consultation are more likely to obtain a referral for CA, (2) African American patients are less likely to have a cardiology consultation, and (3) among patients referred for CA, there is no difference by race in receipt of the procedure. To determine if they obtained a referral for or received CA, 2.623 candidates for CA were followed. Multivariate models were estimated using logistic regression. Cardiology consultation was associated with referral for CA (OR = 5.1, p < .001). White patients had higher odds of cardiology consultation (OR = 2.2, p < .001). The racial disparity was reduced among patients who received a referral (OR = 1.4, p < .05). Researchers must eliminate racial differences in access to specialty care and variation in referral patterns by physician specialty, and efforts must be targeted to those specialties where greater disparities exist.
作者研究了关于冠状动脉造影(CA)使用方面种族差异的三种假设:(1)接受心脏病学会诊的患者更有可能获得CA转诊;(2)非裔美国患者接受心脏病学会诊的可能性较小;(3)在被转诊进行CA的患者中,接受该检查的情况在种族上没有差异。为了确定他们是否获得了CA转诊或接受了CA检查,对2623名CA候选患者进行了跟踪。使用逻辑回归估计多变量模型。心脏病学会诊与CA转诊相关(比值比[OR]=5.1,p<.001)。白人患者进行心脏病学会诊的几率更高(OR=2.2,p<.001)。在获得转诊的患者中,种族差异有所减少(OR=1.4,p<.05)。研究人员必须消除在获得专科护理方面的种族差异以及不同专科医生转诊模式的差异,并且必须针对存在较大差异的专科采取措施。