Ayanian J Z, Udvarhelyi I S, Gatsonis C A, Pashos C L, Epstein A M
Division of General Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
JAMA. 1993 May 26;269(20):2642-6.
To assess whether rates of coronary revascularization procedures differ between blacks and whites after coronary angiography is performed and to assess the relationship of these rates to hospital characteristics.
A retrospective cohort study using 1987 and 1988 data on hospital claims and characteristics from the Health Care Financing Administration.
One thousand four hundred twenty-nine acute care hospitals that provide coronary angiography in the United States.
A national sample of 27,485 Medicare Part A enrollees, aged 65 to 74 years, who underwent inpatient angiography for coronary heart disease in 1987.
The adjusted odds of revascularization with either coronary angioplasty or bypass graft surgery within 90 days of angiography for whites relative to blacks, controlling for age, sex, region, Medicaid eligibility, principal diagnosis, comorbid diagnoses, and hospital characteristics of ownership, teaching status, urban/suburban or rural location, and availability of revascularization procedures.
White men and women were significantly more likely than black men and women, respectively, to receive a revascularization procedure after coronary angiography (57% and 50% vs 40% and 34%, both P < .001). The adjusted odds of receiving a revascularization procedure after coronary angiography were 78% higher for whites than blacks (95% confidence interval for odds ratio, 1.56 to 2.03). Statistically significant racial differences in the adjusted odds of receiving a revascularization procedure were present in all types of hospitals except rural hospitals, and these differences did not vary significantly by any of the four hospital characteristics (all P > .20 for interaction terms).
Among Medicare enrollees, whites are more likely than blacks to receive revascularization procedures after coronary angiography. Racial differences of similar magnitude occur in all types of hospitals. These differences may reflect overuse in whites or underuse in blacks, but they are unlikely to reflect access to cardiologists or hospitals that perform revascularization procedures. Potential explanations include unmeasured clinical or socioeconomic factors, differing patient preferences, and racial bias at the hospitals performing angiography.
评估冠状动脉造影术后黑人和白人进行冠状动脉血运重建术的比例是否存在差异,并评估这些比例与医院特征之间的关系。
一项回顾性队列研究,使用了1987年和1988年来自医疗保健财务管理局的医院索赔和特征数据。
美国1429家提供冠状动脉造影的急性护理医院。
一个由27485名年龄在65至74岁之间的医疗保险A部分参保人组成的全国样本,他们于1987年因冠心病接受了住院血管造影。
在控制年龄、性别、地区、医疗补助资格、主要诊断、合并诊断以及医院所有权、教学状况、城市/郊区或农村位置以及血运重建手术可用性等医院特征的情况下,白人相对于黑人在血管造影后90天内接受冠状动脉成形术或搭桥手术进行血运重建的调整后比值比。
白人男性和女性在冠状动脉造影后接受血运重建手术的可能性分别显著高于黑人男性和女性(分别为57%和50%,而黑人男性和女性为40%和34%,P均<.001)。冠状动脉造影后接受血运重建手术的调整后比值比,白人比黑人高78%(比值比的95%置信区间为1.56至2.03)。除农村医院外,所有类型医院在接受血运重建手术的调整后比值比上均存在统计学上显著的种族差异,并且这些差异在四个医院特征中的任何一个方面均无显著变化(所有交互项的P>.20)。
在医疗保险参保人中,白人在冠状动脉造影后比黑人更有可能接受血运重建手术。所有类型的医院都存在类似程度的种族差异。这些差异可能反映了白人的过度使用或黑人的使用不足,但不太可能反映获得进行血运重建手术的心脏病专家或医院的机会。潜在的解释包括未测量的临床或社会经济因素、不同的患者偏好以及进行血管造影的医院中的种族偏见。