Goldman Lee, Kirtane Ajay J
Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143-0120, USA.
Ann Intern Med. 2003 Dec 16;139(12):987-95. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-139-12-200312160-00008.
Few diagnostic decisions in medicine have been more heavily researched than the approach to the patient with acute chest pain. Despite the advances in both diagnosing and treating patients presenting with this symptom, cases of missed myocardial infarctions still cause substantial morbidity and mortality. This article examines a case in which a patient was sent home from the emergency department after presenting with chest pain and was subsequently found to have a myocardial infarction. In the context of the case, the article discusses clinical decision making about the diagnosis and triage of patients presenting with acute chest pain or with symptoms consistent with possible cardiac ischemia. A standardized approach to addressing the management of these patients is essential, given the adverse consequences of missing a life-threatening condition.
医学中,很少有诊断决策比处理急性胸痛患者的方法受到更深入的研究。尽管在诊断和治疗出现这种症状的患者方面取得了进展,但漏诊心肌梗死的病例仍会导致相当高的发病率和死亡率。本文研究了这样一个病例:一名患者因胸痛到急诊科就诊后被送回家,随后被发现患有心肌梗死。结合该病例,本文讨论了关于诊断和分诊出现急性胸痛或有与可能的心脏缺血相符症状患者的临床决策。鉴于漏诊危及生命疾病的不良后果,采用标准化方法处理这些患者至关重要。