Suppr超能文献

加拿大医生对慢性疼痛使用阿片类药物的态度调查。

Attitudes toward opioid use for chronic pain: a Canadian physician survey.

作者信息

Morley-Forster Patricia K, Clark Alexander J, Speechley Mark, Moulin Dwight E

机构信息

University of Western Ontario Interdisciplinary Pain Program, St. Joseph's Health Care, London, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Pain Res Manag. 2003 Winter;8(4):189-94. doi: 10.1155/2003/184247.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To measure chronic pain patient volumes seen in primary care practice; to determine what medications physicians choose for the treatment of moderate to severe chronic pain; to identify barriers to the use of opioids in the treatment of chronic pain; and to assess physicians' attitudes toward the current management of chronic pain in Canada.

DESIGN

A computer-assisted telephone survey of 100 regionally representative Canadian physicians with a defined interest in palliative care (PC, n=30) or noncancer pain (GP, n=70).

SETTING

A survey was conducted by Ipsos-Reid in June 2001. Only physicians who met the eligibility criteria of having written 20 or more prescriptions for moderate to severe pain in the preceding four weeks or having devoted 20% of time to palliative care were eligible to participate.

RESULTS

In one month, the average number of patients with moderate to severe chronic pain seen by PCs was 94.2; the average seen by GPs was 44.7. The pain experienced by 83.3% of GP patients was noncancer related. For chronic cancer pain, an opioid analgesic was the treatment of choice of 79% of physicians (48% preferred morphine, 21% codeine, 10% other). For moderate to severe chronic noncancer pain, opioids were the first-line treatment of only 32% of physicians (16% preferred codeine, 16% major opioids) because a significant number preferred either non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (29%) or acetaminophen (16%). Thirty-five per cent of GPs and 23% of PCs would never use opioids for noncancer pain, even when described as severe. Chronic pain was deemed by 68% of physicians to be inadequately managed. Almost 60% thought that pain management could be enhanced by improved physician education. Identified barriers to opioid use included addiction potential (37%) and side effects (25%). Seventeen per cent of GPs and 10% of PCs thought that regulatory sanctions limited opioid prescribing.

CONCLUSIONS

Even among physicians experienced in chronic pain treatment, there is a reluctance to use opioids for severe nonmalignant pain. One-half of the survey participants believed that there was a need for improved physician education in pain management, including the use of opioids.

摘要

目的

测量基层医疗实践中慢性疼痛患者的数量;确定医生治疗中度至重度慢性疼痛所选用的药物;找出慢性疼痛治疗中使用阿片类药物的障碍;并评估医生对加拿大当前慢性疼痛管理的态度。

设计

对100名对姑息治疗(PC,n = 30)或非癌性疼痛(全科医生,n = 70)有明确兴趣的具有地域代表性的加拿大医生进行计算机辅助电话调查。

背景

益普索-里德公司于2001年6月进行了一项调查。只有符合资格标准的医生才有资格参与,这些标准包括在前四周内开具20张或更多治疗中度至重度疼痛的处方,或有20%的时间用于姑息治疗。

结果

在一个月内,姑息治疗医生诊治的中度至重度慢性疼痛患者的平均数量为94.2人;全科医生诊治的平均数量为44.7人。83.3%的全科医生患者所经历的疼痛与癌症无关。对于慢性癌痛,79%的医生选择阿片类镇痛药进行治疗(48%首选吗啡,21%首选可待因,10%选择其他)。对于中度至重度慢性非癌性疼痛,只有32%的医生将阿片类药物作为一线治疗药物(16%首选可待因,16%首选主要阿片类药物),因为相当一部分医生更喜欢非甾体抗炎药(29%)或对乙酰氨基酚(16%)。35%的全科医生和23%的姑息治疗医生即使在疼痛被描述为严重时,也绝不会将阿片类药物用于非癌性疼痛的治疗。68%的医生认为慢性疼痛管理不善。近60%的医生认为通过改善医生教育可以加强疼痛管理。已确定的阿片类药物使用障碍包括成瘾可能性(37%)和副作用(25%)。17%的全科医生和10%的姑息治疗医生认为监管制裁限制了阿片类药物的处方。

结论

即使在有慢性疼痛治疗经验的医生中,对于严重非恶性疼痛也不愿使用阿片类药物。一半的调查参与者认为有必要改善医生在疼痛管理方面的教育,包括阿片类药物的使用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验