Healy Tara C
School of Social Work, University of Southern Maine, 96 Falmouth Street, Portland, ME 04104-9300, USA.
Health Soc Work. 2003 Nov;28(4):293-301. doi: 10.1093/hsw/28.4.293.
This qualitative study examines social workers' ethical tension as they evaluate decisional capacity of elderly individuals experiencing some degree of cognitive impairment. An interview guide of open-ended questions was used with a convenience sample of 17 home health care social workers. Constant comparative analysis was used to examine factors contributing to ethical tension. Three areas emerged as highly relevant to participants ethical decisions: (1) clinical uncertainty, (2) pressure from other professionals, and (3) a combination of pressure from other professionals and clinical uncertainty. Clinical uncertainty was influenced by partial cognitive impairment, mental health problems, the interplay of health and mental health, and unclear etiology of poor decisional capacity. Pressure from other professionals typically involved issues of compliance and medical safety. Ethical tension was particularly strong when participants experienced both pressure from other professionals and clinical uncertainty.
这项定性研究考察了社会工作者在评估有一定程度认知障碍的老年人的决策能力时所面临的伦理困境。研究采用了一份包含开放式问题的访谈指南,对17名家庭健康护理社会工作者进行了便利抽样。运用持续比较分析法来探究导致伦理困境的因素。有三个领域与参与者的伦理决策高度相关:(1)临床不确定性;(2)来自其他专业人员的压力;(3)来自其他专业人员的压力与临床不确定性的结合。临床不确定性受到部分认知障碍、心理健康问题、健康与心理健康的相互作用以及决策能力低下的病因不明等因素的影响。来自其他专业人员的压力通常涉及依从性和医疗安全问题。当参与者同时面临来自其他专业人员的压力和临床不确定性时,伦理困境尤为突出。