Waters Teresa M, Studdert David M, Brennan Troyen A, Thomas Eric J, Almagor Orit, Mancewicz Martha, Budetti Peter P
Center for Health Services Research, Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN 38163, USA.
Inquiry. 2003 Fall;40(3):283-94. doi: 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_40.3.283.
Policymakers and commentators are concerned that the National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB) has influenced malpractice litigation dynamics. This study examines whether the introduction of the NPDB changed the outcomes, process, and equity of malpractice litigation. Using pre- and post-NPDB analyses, we examine rates of unpaid claims, trials, resolution time, physician defense costs, and payments on claims with a low/high probability of negligence. We find that physicians and their insurers have been less likely to settle claims since introduction of the NPDB, especially for payments less than dollars 50,000. Because this disruption appears to have decreased the proportion of questionable claims receiving compensation, the NPDB actually may have increased overall tort system specificity.
政策制定者和评论家担心国家从业者数据库(NPDB)影响了医疗事故诉讼动态。本研究考察了NPDB的引入是否改变了医疗事故诉讼的结果、过程和公平性。通过对NPDB引入前后的分析,我们研究了未支付索赔率、审判率、解决时间、医生辩护成本以及低/高过失概率索赔的赔付情况。我们发现,自NPDB引入以来,医生及其保险公司达成索赔和解的可能性降低,尤其是赔付金额低于5万美元的情况。由于这种干扰似乎降低了获得赔偿的可疑索赔比例,NPDB实际上可能提高了整个侵权责任制度的针对性。