Waters Teresa M, Budetti Peter P, Claxton Gary, Lundy Janet P
Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Mar-Apr;26(2):500-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.2.500.
State and federal initiatives to enact medical malpractice tort reforms lack an empirical basis for understanding how reforms might affect malpractice premiums and costs. This paper ranks each state's tort provisions, uses multivariate analysis to measure the effects of strong versus weak enactments on paid claims, and identifies tort law patterns associated with high and low claims frequency and payment levels. Our results suggest that (1) the size and number of medical malpractice payments are affected by only some tort reforms; and (2) the pattern of reforms differs between states with high versus low levels of claims or payments.
州和联邦层面制定医疗事故侵权责任改革的举措,缺乏用以理解改革可能如何影响医疗事故保险费及成本的实证依据。本文对各州的侵权责任条款进行排名,运用多变量分析来衡量有力与无力的立法对已赔付索赔的影响,并识别与高索赔频率和赔付水平以及低索赔频率和赔付水平相关的侵权法模式。我们的结果表明:(1)医疗事故赔付的规模和数量仅受某些侵权责任改革的影响;(2)在索赔或赔付水平高的州与低的州之间,改革模式存在差异。