Latini Roberto, Masson Serge, Staszewsky Lidia, Maggioni Aldo P
Department of Cardiovascular Research, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche, Mario Negri, via Eritrea 62, 20157 Milan, Italy.
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2004 Jan;5(1):181-93. doi: 10.1517/14656566.5.1.181.
Heart failure (HF) still has a discouraging prognosis. Therapeutic strategies aim to reduce mortality as well as slow the progression of the disease, improve symptoms and reduce the frequency of hospital admission. Activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is a hallmark of several cardiocirculatory diseases, including HF. Drugs for evidence-based therapy of HF are angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), beta-blockers and aldosterone antagonists. A promising alternative is a more complete action on the RAAS through selective blockade of the angiotensin type 1 (AT(1)) receptors, taking into account not only physiopathological issues but also pharmacological, experimental and clinical data. The effect of valsartan, an orally-active, selective antagonist of AT(1) receptors, on the outcome in patients with chronic and symptomatic HF was evaluated in a large-scale, international, placebo-controlled clinical study, the Valsartan in Heart Failure Trial (Val-HeFT). In this study, overall mortality was similar in the valsartan and placebo groups (19.7 and 19.4%, respectively). However, valsartan, in addition to recommended therapy of HF including an ACEI, significantly reduced the combined end point of mortality and morbidity, with a significant reduction in the risk of hospitalisation, paralleled by improvements in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, signs and symptoms and quality of life. Valsartan also improved left ventricular anatomy and function and significantly reduced neurohormonal activation. These results were confirmed and extended by the CHARM trial, where the benefits of candesartan were proved not only in all 7599 patients with HF, but also in the 2548 given an ACEI, the 2028 not given an ACEI and in the 3023 patients with an ejection fraction of > 40%. In conclusion, the first choice for HF remains an ACEI with a beta-blocker, but two new options are emerging. In patients intolerant to ACEI, the combination of valsartan or candesartan with a beta-blocker is proposed, whereas an ACEI with either valsartan or candesartan can be considered in patients intolerant to or with contraindications to beta-blockers.
心力衰竭(HF)的预后仍然令人沮丧。治疗策略旨在降低死亡率、减缓疾病进展、改善症状并减少住院频率。肾素 - 血管紧张素 - 醛固酮系统(RAAS)的激活是包括HF在内的几种心血管疾病的一个标志。用于HF循证治疗的药物有血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)、β受体阻滞剂和醛固酮拮抗剂。一个有前景的替代方法是通过选择性阻断1型血管紧张素(AT(1))受体对RAAS进行更全面的作用,这不仅要考虑生理病理问题,还要考虑药理、实验和临床数据。在一项大规模、国际性、安慰剂对照的临床研究——缬沙坦心力衰竭试验(Val-HeFT)中,评估了口服活性的AT(1)受体选择性拮抗剂缬沙坦对慢性症状性HF患者预后的影响。在这项研究中,缬沙坦组和安慰剂组的总死亡率相似(分别为19.7%和19.4%)。然而,缬沙坦除了包括ACEI在内的HF推荐治疗外,还显著降低了死亡率和发病率的联合终点,住院风险显著降低,同时纽约心脏协会(NYHA)心功能分级、体征和症状以及生活质量均有改善。缬沙坦还改善了左心室结构和功能,并显著降低了神经激素激活。氯沙坦心力衰竭评估研究(CHARM)试验证实并扩展了这些结果,在该试验中,坎地沙坦的益处不仅在所有7599例HF患者中得到证实,而且在2548例服用ACEI的患者、2028例未服用ACEI的患者以及3023例射血分数>40%的患者中也得到证实。总之,HF的首选治疗仍然是ACEI联合β受体阻滞剂,但出现了两种新的选择。对于不耐受ACEI的患者,建议使用缬沙坦或坎地沙坦联合β受体阻滞剂,而对于不耐受β受体阻滞剂或有β受体阻滞剂禁忌证的患者,可以考虑使用ACEI联合缬沙坦或坎地沙坦。