Suppr超能文献

临床眼电图稳定性研究

Studies on the stability of the clinical electro-oculogram.

作者信息

Timmins N, Marmor M F

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Stanford University School of Medicine, California.

出版信息

Doc Ophthalmol. 1992;81(2):163-71. doi: 10.1007/BF00156005.

Abstract

The electro-oculogram is variable as a clinical test, but the recording technique has not been standardized, and differences in the protocols for adaptation and stimulation among laboratories may contribute to the variability. To analyze some of these factors, we performed more than 100 electro-oculograms on a single subject under different conditions. Both the Arden ratio and the ratio of light peak amplitude to a stable dark-adapted baseline were independent of pupillary dilation but linearly related to retinal illumination measured in trolands. Between 3.0 and 4.0 log trolands, the values began to level off, but they were difficult to interpret because of subject discomfort above 3.5 log trolands. The Arden ratios were influenced by preadaptation light levels and were roughly 20% higher above 90 cd/m2 than below 45 cd/m2. There was a circadian rhythm in dark trough, baseline and light peak values, but the composite Arden ratio and light peak/baseline ratio showed little circadian effect. The light peak/baseline ratios were slightly more stable than the Arden ratios; the variability (defined as [standard deviation x 100]/mean) was 6.6% and 12.5%, respectively. Our results suggest that stimulus intensities for clinical electro-oculographic testing should be between 3.0 and 3.5 log trolands; pupil dilation is optional. This translates into light levels of 141-447 cd/m2 for a 3-mm pupil and 20-63 cd/m2 for an 8-mm pupil. The reduction in variability and independence from preadaptation achieved by using the light peak/baseline ratio instead of the Arden ratio must be weighed against the time required to achieve a stable dark baseline.

摘要

作为一项临床检测手段,眼电图结果多变,但其记录技术尚未标准化,各实验室在适应和刺激方案上的差异可能导致了这种变异性。为分析其中一些因素,我们在不同条件下对一名受试者进行了100多次眼电图检测。阿登比率以及光峰振幅与稳定暗适应基线的比率均与瞳孔扩张无关,但与以托兰为单位测量的视网膜照度呈线性相关。在3.0至4.0对数托兰之间,这些值开始趋于平稳,但由于在3.5对数托兰以上受试者会感到不适,所以这些值难以解读。阿登比率受预适应光照水平的影响,在90 cd/m²以上时比在45 cd/m²以下时大约高20%。暗谷、基线和光峰值存在昼夜节律,但综合阿登比率和光峰/基线比率几乎没有昼夜节律效应。光峰/基线比率比阿登比率略稳定;变异性(定义为[标准差×100]/平均值)分别为6.6%和12.5%。我们的结果表明,临床眼电图检测的刺激强度应在3.0至3.5对数托兰之间;瞳孔扩张可选择进行。对于3毫米的瞳孔,这相当于141 - 447 cd/m²的光照水平,对于8毫米的瞳孔,则相当于20 - 63 cd/m²的光照水平。使用光峰/基线比率而非阿登比率所实现的变异性降低以及对预适应的独立性,必须与达到稳定暗基线所需的时间相权衡。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验