Ware Marcus L, Larson David A, Sneed Penny K, Wara William W, McDermott Michael W
Department of Neurological Surgery and Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143, USA.
Neurosurgery. 2004 Jan;54(1):55-63; discussion 63-4. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000097199.26412.2a.
Recurrent atypical and malignant meningiomas are difficult to treat successfully. Chemotherapy to date has been unsuccessful, and radiosurgery is limited to smaller tumors. Reoperation alone provides limited tumor control and limited prolonged survival. The addition of brachytherapy at the time of operation is an option. Here, we report the results of our series of patients with recurrent malignant meningioma treated with resection and brachytherapy with permanent low-dose (125)I.
The charts of patients in our database with recurrent atypical and malignant meningiomas treated by surgical resection and permanent (125)I brachytherapy at the University of California, San Francisco, between 1988 and 2002 were selected for this study. Calculations of disease-free survival and overall survival curves were made by the Kaplan-Meier actuarial method. Univariate analysis between Kaplan-Meier curves was based on the log-rank statistic, with a significance level set at a value of P </= 0.05.
Seventeen patients had recurrent malignant meningioma, and four had recurrent atypical meningioma. The median number of sources implanted after surgical resection was 30 (range, 4-112 sources), with a median total activity of 20 mCi (range, 3.3-85.9 mCi). The median time to progression after brachytherapy was 11.6 months for patients with malignant meningioma and 10.4 months for the combined group. There was a trend toward longer disease-free survival time in patients after gross total resection versus subtotal resection and in patients with tumors located at the convexity and parasagittally versus at the cranial base. These differences did not reach statistical significance. The median overall survival after diagnosis was 9.4 years for patients with atypical meningioma, 6.6 years for those with malignant meningioma, and 8.0 years for all patients combined. Survival from the time of resection and implantation of (125)I was 1.6 years for patients with atypical meningioma, 2.4 years for patients with malignant meningioma, and 2.4 years for the combined group. Thirty-three percent of patients had complications requiring surgical intervention. Radiation necrosis occurred in 27% of patients; 13% underwent surgery for radiation necrosis. In addition, 27% had a wound breakdown and required surgical intervention.
The options for patients with recurrent atypical or malignant meningiomas are limited. Our results suggest that for tumors not suitable for radiosurgery, resection followed by permanent brachytherapy should be considered as a potential salvage treatment. However, this approach results in a relatively high complication rate in these heavily treated patients and requires meticulous surgical technique and medical therapies to assist with wound healing after surgery.
复发性非典型和恶性脑膜瘤难以成功治疗。迄今为止,化疗尚未成功,而放射外科手术仅限于较小的肿瘤。单纯再次手术对肿瘤的控制有限,延长生存期的效果也有限。术中添加近距离放射治疗是一种选择。在此,我们报告了一系列接受手术切除和永久性低剂量(125)I 近距离放射治疗的复发性恶性脑膜瘤患者的治疗结果。
选取 1988 年至 2002 年期间在加利福尼亚大学旧金山分校接受手术切除和永久性(125)I 近距离放射治疗的复发性非典型和恶性脑膜瘤患者的病历用于本研究。采用 Kaplan-Meier 精算方法计算无病生存期和总生存期曲线。Kaplan-Meier 曲线之间的单因素分析基于对数秩统计,显著性水平设定为 P≤0.05。
17 例患者患有复发性恶性脑膜瘤,4 例患有复发性非典型脑膜瘤。手术切除后植入的放射源中位数为 30 个(范围为 4 - 112 个放射源),总活度中位数为 20 mCi(范围为 3.3 - 85.9 mCi)。恶性脑膜瘤患者近距离放射治疗后的进展中位数时间为 11.6 个月,联合组为 10.4 个月。与次全切除患者相比,接受全切除的患者以及肿瘤位于凸面和矢状窦旁的患者与位于颅底的患者相比,无病生存期有延长趋势。但这些差异未达到统计学意义。非典型脑膜瘤患者诊断后的总生存期中位数为 9.4 年,恶性脑膜瘤患者为 6.6 年,所有患者联合起来为 8.0 年。非典型脑膜瘤患者从切除和植入(125)I 时起的生存期为 1.6 年,恶性脑膜瘤患者为 2.4 年,联合组为 2.4 年。33%的患者出现需要手术干预的并发症。27%的患者发生放射性坏死;13%的患者因放射性坏死接受了手术。此外,27%的患者伤口裂开,需要手术干预。
复发性非典型或恶性脑膜瘤患者的治疗选择有限。我们的结果表明,对于不适合放射外科手术的肿瘤,手术切除后进行永久性近距离放射治疗应被视为一种潜在的挽救性治疗方法。然而,这种方法在这些接受过大量治疗的患者中会导致相对较高的并发症发生率,并且需要精细的手术技术和医疗治疗来辅助术后伤口愈合。