Goldman Allan P, Cassidy Jane, de Leval Marc, Haynes Simon, Brown Katherine, Whitmore Pauline, Cohen Gordon, Tsang Victor, Elliott Martin, Davison Anne, Hamilton Leslie, Bolton David, Wray Jo, Hasan Asif, Radley-Smith Rosemary, Macrae Duncan, Smith Jon
Great Ormond Street Children's Hospital, Great Ormond Street, WC1N 3JY, London, UK.
Lancet. 2003 Dec 13;362(9400):1967-70. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)15015-5.
Although mechanical circulatory support might not increase the number of adults surviving to transplantation, because of the shortage of donor organs, the situation might be different for children. Our aim was to assess the effect of mechanical assist devices to bridge children with end-stage cardiomyopathy to heart transplantation.
A 5-year retrospective review was undertaken with data from the UK paediatric transplant programme and from bridging to transplant done at two paediatric transplant centres in the UK.
Between Jan 1, 1998 and Dec 31, 2002, 22 children with end-stage cardiomyopathy, median age 5.7 years (range 1.2-17), were supported by a mechanical assist device as a bridge to first heart transplantation, with a 77% survival rate to hospital discharge. Nine were supported by a paracorporeal ventricular assist device, six received transplantation, five survived to discharge (55%), with one late death. 13 were supported by extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation, and 12 were transplanted and survived to discharge (92%) with one late death. With urgent listing, the median waiting time for a heart was 7.5 days (range 1.5-22 days). The correlation between the proportion of patients bridged to transplantation and the proportion of patients dying while on the transplant waiting list was r=-0.93, p=0.02.
Our findings lend support to the hypothesis that a national mechanical assist programme to bridge children to transplantation can minimise the number dying while on the heart transplant waiting list. In the context of urgent listing and a short waiting time, extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation seems to provide the safest form of support.
尽管机械循环支持可能不会增加存活至移植的成年人数,但由于供体器官短缺,儿童的情况可能有所不同。我们的目的是评估机械辅助装置对终末期心肌病患儿进行心脏移植桥接的效果。
对英国儿科移植项目以及英国两个儿科移植中心进行的移植桥接数据进行了为期5年的回顾性研究。
在1998年1月1日至2002年12月31日期间,22例终末期心肌病患儿(中位年龄5.7岁,范围1.2 - 17岁)接受了机械辅助装置支持作为首次心脏移植的桥接,出院存活率为77%。9例接受了体外心室辅助装置支持,6例接受了移植,5例存活出院(55%),1例晚期死亡。13例接受了体外膜肺氧合支持,12例接受了移植并存活出院(92%),1例晚期死亡。在紧急列入名单后,心脏移植的中位等待时间为7.5天(范围1.5 - 22天)。接受移植桥接的患者比例与在移植等待名单上死亡的患者比例之间的相关性为r = -0.93,p = 0.02。
我们的研究结果支持这样一种假设,即全国性的机械辅助项目将儿童桥接至移植可以使在心脏移植等待名单上死亡的人数降至最低。在紧急列入名单和等待时间较短的情况下,体外膜肺氧合似乎提供了最安全的支持形式。