• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于心理生理学中的“心理”:身心效应史的笔记。

On the psycho- in psychophysiology: notes for a history of the mind-body effect.

作者信息

Taylor Eugene

出版信息

Adv Mind Body Med. 2003 Fall-Winter;19(3-4):17-23.

PMID:14686268
Abstract

One hundred and twenty-five years of the dialogue between psychology and physiology reveal a vibrant discussion about the mind-body effect--the ability of waking consciousness to influence its own normally unconscious physiology through conscious intention, and conversely, the reciprocal effect of physiology on consciousness. In the early phase, the data remained largely anecdotal. Scientific study of the emotions then opened the door to dynamic theories of the subconscious. Such formulations, however, were repeatedly overshadowed by concurrent advances in brain neurophysiology, which rejected not only any exploration of the unconscious that relied on the method of symbolism, but also the reality of the unconscious itself. Nevertheless, scientific advances at the interface between psychology and physiology persisted. Since the 1950s, however, there has been an explosion of new work in the neurosciences at the interface between molecular genetics, endocrinology, neurology, immunology, and psychiatry. This has fueled both new research and renewed discussion about the mind-body effect, a dialogue that is now, in part, also a response to a counter-culture revolution occurring at the interface between the delivery of clinical services throughout the healthcare professions and an increasingly sophisticated consumer demand for alternative and complementary therapies.

摘要

心理学与生理学之间长达125年的对话揭示了一场关于身心效应的热烈讨论——清醒意识通过有意识的意图影响其自身通常无意识的生理机能的能力,以及相反地,生理机能对意识的相互影响。在早期阶段,数据大多只是轶事性的。对情绪的科学研究随后为潜意识的动态理论打开了大门。然而,这些理论表述一再被大脑神经生理学的同时进展所掩盖,大脑神经生理学不仅拒绝任何依赖象征主义方法对无意识的探索,也拒绝无意识本身的真实性。尽管如此,心理学与生理学交叉领域的科学进展仍在持续。然而,自20世纪50年代以来,在分子遗传学、内分泌学、神经病学、免疫学和精神病学交叉的神经科学领域出现了大量新的研究成果。这推动了关于身心效应的新研究和重新讨论,这场对话现在部分也是对整个医疗行业临床服务提供与消费者对替代和补充疗法日益复杂的需求之间交叉领域发生的反文化革命的回应。

相似文献

1
On the psycho- in psychophysiology: notes for a history of the mind-body effect.关于心理生理学中的“心理”:身心效应史的笔记。
Adv Mind Body Med. 2003 Fall-Winter;19(3-4):17-23.
2
Development of the concept of mind.心智概念的发展
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2007 Dec;41(12):943-56. doi: 10.1080/00048670701689477.
3
[Explosion of the subjective world].[主观世界的爆发]
Ann Acad Med Stetin. 2006;52(1):119-24.
4
Implications of the current insolubility of the mind-brain problem for the contemporary practice of psychodynamic psychiatry.当前心脑问题的不可解性对当代精神动力精神病学实践的影响。
J Am Acad Psychoanal Dyn Psychiatry. 2009 Summer;37(2):315-51. doi: 10.1521/jaap.2009.37.2.315.
5
Soul searching: a brief history of the mind/body debate in the neurosciences.心灵探索:神经科学中身心辩论简史
Neurosurg Focus. 2007;23(1):E2. doi: 10.3171/foc.2007.23.1.2.
6
Dualism persists in the science of mind.二元论在心智科学中依然存在。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009 Mar;1157:1-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2008.04117.x.
7
The antique origin of the mind-brain problem.心脑问题的古老起源。
Conn Med. 2006 Jan;70(1):51-3.
8
Neuroscience is awaiting for a breakthrough: an essay bridging the concepts of Descartes, Einstein, Heisenberg, Hebb and Hayek with the explanatory formulations in this special issue.神经科学正等待着一次突破:一篇将笛卡尔、爱因斯坦、海森堡、赫布和哈耶克的概念与本期特刊中的解释性表述联系起来的文章。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2006 May;60(2):194-201. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2005.12.010. Epub 2006 Apr 27.
9
'Introspectionism' and the mythical origins of scientific psychology.“内省主义”与科学心理学的神话起源
Conscious Cogn. 2006 Dec;15(4):634-54. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2006.09.008.
10
Mind, medicine, and metaphysics: reflections on the reclamation of the human spirit.心灵、医学与形而上学:关于人类精神回归的思考
Am J Psychother. 2003;57(1):18-31. doi: 10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.2003.57.1.18.