Suppr超能文献

“内省主义”与科学心理学的神话起源

'Introspectionism' and the mythical origins of scientific psychology.

作者信息

Costall Alan

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO1 2DY, UK.

出版信息

Conscious Cogn. 2006 Dec;15(4):634-54. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2006.09.008.

Abstract

According to the majority of the textbooks, the history of modern, scientific psychology can be tidily encapsulated in the following three stages. Scientific psychology began with a commitment to the study of mind, but based on the method of introspection. Watson rejected introspectionism as both unreliable and effete, and redefined psychology, instead, as the science of behaviour. The cognitive revolution, in turn, replaced the mind as the subject of study, and rejected both behaviourism and a reliance on introspection. This paper argues that all three stages of this history are largely mythical. Introspectionism was never a dominant movement within modern psychology, and the method of introspection never went away. Furthermore, this version of psychology's history obscures some deep conceptual problems, not least surrounding the modern conception of "behaviour," that continues to make the scientific study of consciousness seem so weird.

摘要

根据大多数教科书的说法,现代科学心理学的历史可以简洁地概括为以下三个阶段。科学心理学始于对心灵研究的承诺,但基于内省法。华生摒弃了内省主义,认为其既不可靠又无效,转而将心理学重新定义为行为科学。认知革命则反过来将心灵作为研究对象,同时摒弃了行为主义和对内省的依赖。本文认为,这段历史的所有三个阶段在很大程度上都是虚构的。内省主义从未在现代心理学中成为主导运动,内省法也从未消失。此外,这种心理学史的版本掩盖了一些深层次的概念问题,尤其是围绕现代“行为”概念的问题,这些问题使得对意识的科学研究仍然显得如此怪异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验