Love Jeffrey M, Greve Kevin W, Sherwin Elisabeth, Mathias Charles
Department of Psychology, University of New Orleans, Louisiana 70148, USA.
Appl Neuropsychol. 2003;10(4):246-51. doi: 10.1207/s15324826an1004_7.
The aim of this study was to investigate the comparability of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test short form (WCST-64) to the standard form in a clinical population with documented brain pathology: chronic severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Participants were 61 patients at least 1 year after severe TBI living at a large residential rehabilitation facility. The WCST was administered in standard fashion with both the standard and 64-card versions scored. All derived scores with norms were examined. Results indicated that the WCST-64 scores were comparable to the standard version, and assigned impairment levels remained relatively stable. These results suggest the WCST-64 is a valid alternative to the standard version in chronic severe TBI.
慢性重度创伤性脑损伤(TBI)中,调查威斯康星卡片分类测验简版(WCST - 64)与标准版的可比性。研究对象是61名重度创伤性脑损伤至少一年的患者,他们居住在一家大型住院康复机构。以标准方式实施威斯康星卡片分类测验,对标准版和64张卡片版都进行评分。检查了所有带有常模的派生分数。结果表明,WCST - 64的分数与标准版相当,且所确定的损伤水平相对稳定。这些结果表明,在慢性重度创伤性脑损伤中,WCST - 64是标准版的有效替代版本。