Su Chwen-Yng, Wuang Yee-Pay, Chang Jui-Kun, Guo Nai-Wen, Kwan Aij-Lie
School of Occupational Therapy, College of Health Sciences, Kaohsiung Medical University, Taiwan.
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2006 Feb;22(2):75-84. doi: 10.1016/S1607-551X(09)70224-4.
The purpose of this study was to compare the performance differences in the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) between 55 patients with putaminal hemorrhage (PH) 3 months after stroke and 69 age-matched normal controls. Impairment on WCST was defined as performance greater than 1.64 standard deviation below the control mean. A multivariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA) controlling for education yielded a significant main effect for group but not for education and interaction of group x education. Univariate analyses revealed significant between-group differences in five WCST measures, including perseverative errors (PE), perseverative responses (PR), conceptual-level responses (CLR), number of categories completed (NCC), and trials to complete the first category (TCC). For patients with PH, z-scores for two WCST indices were within the impaired range: TCC and PR. A high percentage of patients (40-47%) scored in the designated impaired range on NCC, PR, PE, and TCC. The WCST variables discriminated patients from controls with an overall accurate classification rate of 91.9%. Of these, the variables that contributed most to the differentiation between patients and normal controls were PE, CLR, and total number correct (TNC) (a standardized canonical discriminant function coefficient > 0.40). Finally, no significant hemispheric laterality effects emerged on any of the WCST variables. The results of this study provide further evidence of impaired mental set shifting in stroke patients with PH. The implications for rehabilitation professionals are discussed, and recommendations for further research are made.
本研究旨在比较55例中风后3个月的壳核出血(PH)患者与69例年龄匹配的正常对照在威斯康星卡片分类测验(WCST)中的表现差异。WCST损伤被定义为表现比对照均值低1.64个标准差以上。控制教育程度的多变量协方差分析(MANCOVA)得出组间有显著主效应,但教育程度及组×教育程度的交互作用无显著主效应。单变量分析显示,在WCST的五项指标上组间存在显著差异,包括持续性错误(PE)、持续性反应(PR)、概念水平反应(CLR)、完成的类别数(NCC)以及完成第一个类别的试验次数(TCC)。对于PH患者,WCST的两个指标的z分数处于损伤范围内:TCC和PR。高比例的患者(40 - 47%)在NCC、PR、PE和TCC的指定损伤范围内得分。WCST变量能够区分患者和对照,总体正确分类率为91.9%。其中,对区分患者和正常对照贡献最大的变量是PE、CLR和正确总数(TNC)(标准化典型判别函数系数>0.40)。最后,在任何WCST变量上均未出现显著的半球偏侧效应。本研究结果进一步证明了PH中风患者存在心理定势转换受损。讨论了对康复专业人员的启示,并提出了进一步研究的建议。