Larcher B, Arisi E, Berloffa F, Demichelis F, Eccher C, Galligioni E, Galvagni M, Martini G, Sboner A, Tomio L, Zumiani G, Graiff A, Forti S
Medical Informatics and Telemedicine Laboratory, Istituto Trentino di Cultura-Centro per la Ricerca Scientifica e Tecnologica, Trento, Italy.
Med Inform Internet Med. 2003 Jun;28(2):73-84. doi: 10.1080/14639230310000600470.
There is an increasing interest in assessing telemedicine as alternative method of delivering high quality cancer treatment to patients living in rural areas. In the Province of Trento (north-east Italy) a tele-oncology system was implemented to provide non-surgical oncological consultation to district general hospitals. The aim of this study was to explore user-satisfaction with the system after 6 months of experimentation. During the on-field validation two questionnaires with open and closed-response questions were distributed to 80 physicians and nurses 6 months apart to investigate the users' expected benefits vs. perceived ones. The two questionnaires were compared to assess how perceived benefits differed from expected ones. Significant differences were found regarding improvements in: the standardization of diagnostic-therapeutic procedures using the Electronic Patient Record (EPR)]; information sharing; data updating; consultation speed; and the possibility to diminish patients' travels through the use of teleconsultation (TC). Physicians' responses showed a significant difference regarding the EPR's effects on relationship with patient, the nurses' responses with regards to its effects on care quality. Physicians felt that both modalities of teleconsultation were useful in enhancing communication with colleagues (86% for the synchronous TC, 80% for the asynchronous TC). Responses indicated that the major difficulties encountered were in the introduction of the system into the daily routine. Despite this, user expectations for its future use in clinical field were considerably high.
人们越来越关注将远程医疗作为一种向农村地区患者提供高质量癌症治疗的替代方法。在特伦托省(意大利东北部),实施了一个远程肿瘤学系统,为地区综合医院提供非手术肿瘤学咨询。本研究的目的是在实验6个月后探索用户对该系统的满意度。在现场验证期间,分别在6个月内向80名医生和护士发放了两份包含开放式和封闭式问题的问卷,以调查用户的预期收益与感知收益。比较这两份问卷,以评估感知收益与预期收益的差异。在以下方面发现了显著差异:使用电子病历(EPR)实现诊断 - 治疗程序的标准化;信息共享;数据更新;咨询速度;以及通过使用远程会诊(TC)减少患者出行的可能性。医生的回答在EPR对医患关系的影响方面显示出显著差异,护士的回答在其对护理质量的影响方面显示出显著差异。医生认为两种远程会诊方式都有助于加强与同事的沟通(同步TC为86%,异步TC为80%)。回答表明,遇到的主要困难在于将该系统引入日常工作。尽管如此,用户对其未来在临床领域的使用期望相当高。