• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大学医院中医院内获得性耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌感染与甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌感染的临床毒力比较。

A comparison of clinical virulence of nosocomially acquired methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus infections in a university hospital.

作者信息

Hershow R C, Khayr W F, Smith N L

机构信息

School of Medicine, University of Illinois, Chicago 60612.

出版信息

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1992 Oct;13(10):587-93. doi: 10.1086/646433.

DOI:10.1086/646433
PMID:1469267
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the clinical virulence of nosocomially acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-sensitive S aureus (MSSA) infections in 1989.

DESIGN

A retrospective comparison of host factors, in-hospital exposures, sites of infections, and outcomes of patients with nosocomial MRSA and MSSA infections.

SETTING

University of Illinois Hospital, Chicago, Illinois.

PARTICIPANTS

Forty-four adult patients with nosocomial S aureus infections.

RESULTS

The 22 MRSA-infected and 22 MSSA-infected persons were similar regarding mean age, gender, underlying diseases, and exposure to surgery. Before developing infection, MRSA-infected persons were more likely to have received antibiotics (73% compared with 27%, odds ratio = 7.1, 95% confidence interval [CI95] = 2.0-25.8 p = .003) and to have stayed in the hospital > 2 weeks (64% compared with 18%, odds ratio = 7.9, CI95 = 2.0-31.6, p = .002). Bacteremia was the most common presentation in the MRSA and MSSA groups (55% and 59%, respectively). Infectious complications and death were infrequent in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

MRSA and MSSA strains infect patients with similar demographic features and underlying diseases, but MRSA infections are significantly more common among patients with previous antibiotic therapy and a prolonged preinfection hospital stay. Clinical presentations and outcomes did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. Thus, similar to studies in the early 1980s, our findings do not suggest greater intrinsic virulence of MRSA.

摘要

目的

比较1989年医院获得性耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)感染和甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌(MSSA)感染的临床毒力。

设计

对医院获得性MRSA和MSSA感染患者的宿主因素、院内暴露情况、感染部位和结局进行回顾性比较。

地点

伊利诺伊大学芝加哥分校医院。

研究对象

44例医院获得性金黄色葡萄球菌感染的成年患者。

结果

22例MRSA感染患者和22例MSSA感染患者在平均年龄、性别、基础疾病和接受手术情况方面相似。在发生感染之前,MRSA感染患者更有可能接受过抗生素治疗(73% 对比27%,优势比 = 7.1,95% 置信区间 [CI95] = 2.0 - 25.8,p = .003),并且住院时间超过2周(64% 对比18%,优势比 = 7.9,CI95 = 2.0 - 31.6,p = .002)。菌血症是MRSA组和MSSA组最常见的表现(分别为55%和59%)。两组的感染并发症和死亡情况均不常见。

结论

MRSA和MSSA菌株感染具有相似人口统计学特征和基础疾病的患者,但MRSA感染在先前接受过抗生素治疗且感染前住院时间延长的患者中明显更为常见。两组之间的临床表现和结局没有显著差异。因此,与20世纪80年代早期的研究相似,我们的研究结果并不表明MRSA具有更强的内在毒力。

相似文献

1
A comparison of clinical virulence of nosocomially acquired methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus infections in a university hospital.大学医院中医院内获得性耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌感染与甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌感染的临床毒力比较。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1992 Oct;13(10):587-93. doi: 10.1086/646433.
2
Risk factors for methicillin resistant and sensitive Staphylococcus aureus infection in a Brazilian university hospital.巴西一家大学医院耐甲氧西林和甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌感染的危险因素
Braz J Infect Dis. 2000 Jun;4(3):135-43.
3
Epidemiology and outcomes of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection.社区获得性耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌感染的流行病学及转归
J Clin Microbiol. 2007 Jun;45(6):1705-11. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02311-06. Epub 2007 Mar 28.
4
Comparison of both clinical features and mortality risk associated with bacteremia due to community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus.社区获得性耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌和甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌所致菌血症的临床特征及死亡风险比较。
Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Mar 15;46(6):799-806. doi: 10.1086/527389.
5
Is methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus more virulent than methicillin-susceptible S. aureus? A comparative cohort study of British patients with nosocomial infection and bacteremia.耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌比甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌的毒力更强吗?一项针对英国医院感染和菌血症患者的比较队列研究。
Clin Infect Dis. 2003 Dec 1;37(11):1453-60. doi: 10.1086/379321. Epub 2003 Nov 6.
6
[Colonization by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus is a predictive factor for the resistance phenotype of an infectious strain of S. aureus].耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的定植是金黄色葡萄球菌感染菌株耐药表型的一个预测因素。
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2000 Mar;19(3):151-5. doi: 10.1016/s0750-7658(00)00196-9.
7
Excess costs and utilization associated with methicillin resistance for patients with Staphylococcus aureus infection.耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌感染患者相关的超额费用和利用
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010 Apr;31(4):365-73. doi: 10.1086/651094.
8
Nosocomial methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus primary bacteremia: at what costs?医院获得性耐甲氧西林和甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌原发性菌血症:代价几何?
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1999 Jun;20(6):408-11. doi: 10.1086/501641.
9
[Investigation of SCCmec types and Panton-Valentine leukocidin in community-acquired and nosocomial Staphylococcus aureus strains: comparing skin and soft tissue infections to the other infections].社区获得性和医院获得性金黄色葡萄球菌菌株中葡萄球菌染色体盒式甲氧西林耐药基因(SCCmec)类型及杀白细胞素的研究:皮肤和软组织感染与其他感染的比较
Mikrobiyol Bul. 2012 Jul;46(3):341-51.
10
Virulence gene profiling and molecular characterization of hospital-acquired Staphylococcus aureus isolates associated with bloodstream infection.医院获得性金黄色葡萄球菌血流感染株的毒力基因谱分析及分子特征研究。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012 Dec;74(4):363-8. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2012.08.015. Epub 2012 Sep 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictors of mortality in infections: The role of C-reactive protein, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio.感染中死亡率的预测因素:C反应蛋白、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值及血小板与淋巴细胞比值的作用。
J Int Med Res. 2025 Aug;53(8):3000605251363105. doi: 10.1177/03000605251363105. Epub 2025 Aug 9.
2
Influence of Infection on Partially Ischemic Excisional Skin Wounds.感染对部分缺血性切除皮肤伤口的影响。
Adv Med. 2024 Sep 21;2024:2281747. doi: 10.1155/2024/2281747. eCollection 2024.
3
Evolutionary Pathways and Trajectories in Antibiotic Resistance.
抗生素耐药性的进化途径和轨迹。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2021 Dec 15;34(4):e0005019. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00050-19. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
4
Is methicillin-resistant infection associated with higher mortality and morbidity in hospitalized patients? A cohort study of 551 patients from South Western India.耐甲氧西林感染与住院患者较高的死亡率和发病率相关吗?一项对印度西南部551名患者的队列研究。
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2018 Dec 3;11:243-250. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S176517. eCollection 2018.
5
Risk factors for intensive care unit acquired nasal colonization of MRSA and its impact on MRSA infection.耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)在重症监护病房获得性鼻腔定植的危险因素及其对 MRSA 感染的影响。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2013 Sep;27(5):412-7. doi: 10.1002/jcla.21620.
6
Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and meticillin-susceptible S. aureus pneumonia: comparison of clinical and thin-section CT findings.耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌和甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌肺炎:临床和薄层 CT 表现比较。
Br J Radiol. 2012 Jun;85(1014):e168-75. doi: 10.1259/bjr/65538472. Epub 2011 Jul 12.
7
Control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Canadian paediatric institutions is still a worthwhile goal.在加拿大的儿科机构中控制耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌仍然是一个值得追求的目标。
Paediatr Child Health. 1999 Jul;4(5):337-49. doi: 10.1093/pch/4.5.337.
8
Acquisition of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus after living donor liver transplantation: a retrospective cohort study.活体肝移植后耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌感染:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2008 Nov 11;8:155. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-8-155.
9
Comparison of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia to other staphylococcal species in a neonatal intensive care unit.新生儿重症监护病房中社区获得性耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症与其他葡萄球菌属菌种的比较。
Eur J Pediatr. 2007 Apr;166(4):319-25. doi: 10.1007/s00431-006-0238-5. Epub 2006 Oct 19.
10
A comparison of clinical features and mortality among methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive strains of Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis.耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌性心内膜炎和甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌性心内膜炎的临床特征及死亡率比较。
Yonsei Med J. 2005 Aug 31;46(4):496-502. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2005.46.4.496.