Kaminow Leonard, Schimschock James R, Hammer Anne E, Vuong Alain
Maine Neurology, Scarborough, ME, USA.
Epilepsy Behav. 2003 Dec;4(6):659-66. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2003.08.033.
This open-label study evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of lamotrigine monotherapy compared with monotherapy with conventional antiepileptic drugs in patients converting from previous monotherapy because of inadequate seizure control or unacceptable side effects.
This study was conducted in 26 neurology clinics and epilepsy centers throughout the United States. The study enrolled 115 patients with epilepsy converting from previous monotherapy because of inadequate seizure control or unacceptable side effects. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive 24 weeks of lamotrigine monotherapy or monotherapy with a conventional antiepileptic drug (carbamazepine, phenytoin, or valproate based on physician's choice). Patients were converted during an </=8-week Escalation/Taper Phase from their prestudy antiepileptic drug (carbamazepine, phenytoin, or valproate) to lamotrigine via a protocol-specified dosing algorithm or to conventional therapy via standard dosing guidelines. After monotherapy was achieved, patients continued in the study for a 24-week Maintenance Phase.
More lamotrigine patients (65%) than conventional therapy patients (57%) completed the 24-week Maintenance Phase (primary efficacy endpoint). The mean time to withdrawal from the study was 175 days (SD=83.1) for lamotrigine patients compared with 156 days (SD=80.7) for conventional therapy patients. Adverse events, the most common reason for discontinuing the Maintenance Phase, accounted for 16% of withdrawals among lamotrigine patients compared with 26% of withdrawals among conventional therapy patients. The mean reduction in seizure frequency was 53% (SD=55.1) for patients using lamotrigine compared with 32% (SD=149.9) for patients using conventional therapy. Humanistic measures including investigator global assessment, the patient self-assessment, and QOLIE-31 scores show that lamotrigine monotherapy was perceived by both physicians and patients to have benefits over monotherapy with conventional antiepileptic drugs.
Converting from monotherapy with a less effective or poorly tolerated conventional antiepileptic drug to monotherapy with lamotrigine is associated with better clinical and humanistic outcomes than converting to an alternative conventional antiepileptic drug.
本开放标签研究评估了拉莫三嗪单药治疗与传统抗癫痫药物单药治疗相比的疗效和耐受性,这些患者因之前的单药治疗癫痫控制不佳或出现不可接受的副作用而换药。
本研究在美国26家神经科诊所和癫痫中心进行。该研究纳入了115例因癫痫控制不佳或出现不可接受的副作用而从之前的单药治疗转换过来的癫痫患者。患者按1:1随机分组,接受24周的拉莫三嗪单药治疗或传统抗癫痫药物(卡马西平、苯妥英或丙戊酸盐,由医生选择)单药治疗。在≤8周的递增/减量阶段,患者通过方案指定的给药算法从研究前的抗癫痫药物(卡马西平、苯妥英或丙戊酸盐)转换为拉莫三嗪,或通过标准给药指南转换为传统治疗。达到单药治疗后,患者继续参与研究进入24周的维持阶段。
完成24周维持阶段(主要疗效终点)的拉莫三嗪组患者(65%)多于传统治疗组患者(57%)。拉莫三嗪组患者退出研究的平均时间为175天(标准差=83.1),而传统治疗组患者为156天(标准差=80.7)。不良事件是停止维持阶段治疗的最常见原因,在拉莫三嗪组患者的停药原因中占16%,而在传统治疗组患者中占26%。使用拉莫三嗪的患者癫痫发作频率平均降低53%(标准差=55.1),而使用传统治疗的患者为32%(标准差=149.9)。包括研究者整体评估、患者自我评估和QOLIE - 31评分在内的人文指标显示,医生和患者均认为拉莫三嗪单药治疗比传统抗癫痫药物单药治疗更具优势。
从疗效较差或耐受性不佳的传统抗癫痫药物单药治疗转换为拉莫三嗪单药治疗,与转换为另一种传统抗癫痫药物相比,具有更好的临床和人文结局。