Kosloske Ann M, Love C Lance, Rohrer James E, Goldthorn Jane F, Lacey Stuart R
Department of Surgery, Texas Tech University, Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, USA.
Pediatrics. 2004 Jan;113(1 Pt 1):29-34. doi: 10.1542/peds.113.1.29.
To determine the accuracy of a protocol for diagnosis of appendicitis in children based on clinical evaluation by a pediatric surgeon with selective use of diagnostic imaging studies. We performed this study because 1) current reports in the medical, pediatric, emergency medical, and surgical literature advocate imaging, particularly computed tomography (CT), as the gold standard for diagnosis of appendicitis, and 2) the value of pediatric surgical evaluation early in the management of the child with possible appendicitis has rarely been emphasized. METHODS, DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective review of 356 children (mean age: 9.6 years; range: 1-18 years) referred to a regional pediatric surgical center for possible appendicitis from 1999 through 2001.
Initial pediatric surgical evaluation consisted of history, physical examination, white blood cell count, differential count, and urinalysis. Children diagnosed with appendicitis underwent appendectomy without additional studies; those with equivocal findings received intravenous fluids, rest, and reevaluation after 4 to 6 hours. Imaging was used selectively by the pediatric surgeon.
Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of the protocol based on final diagnoses; rate of appendiceal perforation; and rate of negative appendectomy.
Of 356 children evaluated for appendicitis, 220 (62%) had an appendectomy. Two-hundred nine (95%) had histologically proven appendicitis, and 11 (5%) had a normal appendix. Of the 209 children with appendicitis, 139 (66%) had acute appendicitis, 34 (16%) had advanced appendicitis without perforation, and 36 (17%) had advanced appendicitis with perforation. Appendectomy was performed after initial evaluation in 195 (89%) of the 220 children and after a period of supportive care and observation in 25 (11%) of 220. One hundred thirty-six children (38%) did not have an appendectomy and were discharged with other diagnoses. The sensitivity of this protocol was 99%, specificity was 92%, positive predictive value was 95%, and negative predictive value was 99%. The accuracy was 97% compared with an accuracy of 82% for ultrasound alone and 90% for CT scan alone.
These data show that a protocol based on clinical evaluation by a pediatric surgeon with selective use of imaging was highly accurate for the diagnosis of appendicitis in children. Low rates of negative appendectomy (5%) and perforation (17%) were achieved without the potential costs and radiation exposure of excess imaging.
基于小儿外科医生的临床评估并选择性使用诊断性影像学检查,确定一种儿童阑尾炎诊断方案的准确性。我们开展这项研究的原因如下:1)医学、儿科、急诊医学及外科文献中的当前报告主张将影像学检查,尤其是计算机断层扫描(CT),作为阑尾炎诊断的金标准;2)小儿外科评估在疑似阑尾炎患儿治疗早期的价值很少得到强调。
方法、设计、地点及参与者:对1999年至2001年转诊至某地区小儿外科中心疑似阑尾炎的356名儿童(平均年龄:9.6岁;范围:1至18岁)进行回顾性研究。
初始小儿外科评估包括病史、体格检查、白细胞计数、分类计数及尿液分析。诊断为阑尾炎的儿童无需进一步检查即接受阑尾切除术;检查结果不明确的儿童接受静脉输液、休息,并在4至6小时后重新评估。小儿外科医生选择性地使用影像学检查。
基于最终诊断的该方案敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值及准确性;阑尾穿孔率;阴性阑尾切除率。
在接受阑尾炎评估的356名儿童中,220名(62%)接受了阑尾切除术。209名(95%)经组织学证实患有阑尾炎,11名(5%)阑尾正常。在209名患有阑尾炎的儿童中,139名(66%)为急性阑尾炎,34名(16%)为进展期阑尾炎但未穿孔,36名(17%)为进展期阑尾炎且已穿孔。220名儿童中有195名(89%)在初始评估后接受了阑尾切除术,25名(11%)在经过一段时间的支持治疗和观察后接受了阑尾切除术。136名儿童(38%)未接受阑尾切除术,而是以其他诊断出院。该方案的敏感度为99%,特异度为92%,阳性预测值为95%,阴性预测值为99%。其准确性为97%,相比之下,单独超声检查的准确性为82%,单独CT扫描的准确性为90%。
这些数据表明,基于小儿外科医生临床评估并选择性使用影像学检查的方案对儿童阑尾炎诊断具有高度准确性。在不产生额外影像学检查潜在成本和辐射暴露的情况下,实现了较低的阴性阑尾切除率(5%)和穿孔率(17%)。