Moore Celia L
Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts Boston, MA 02125, USA.
Dev Psychobiol. 2004 Jan;44(1):16-20. doi: 10.1002/dev.10155.
The serious, comparative study of behavioral complexity that Greenberg et al. advocate is a progressive direction for the field, but their proposal to separate comparative psychology from its roots in evolutionary biology seems regressive. Modern evolutionary theory has been broadened within biology to include development and paleontology alongside natural selection, making closer integration with that discipline particularly timely. Such an integrated evolutionary approach in psychology would offer a useful alternative to the adaptationism popularized by evolutionary psychology. Although the differences between comparative psychologists and biologists may be blurred in the process, the behavioral sciences will be better served by a rich biological approach to evolution than by a uniquely psychological approach.
格林伯格等人所倡导的对行为复杂性进行严肃的比较研究是该领域的一个进步方向,但他们将比较心理学与其在进化生物学中的根源相分离的提议似乎是倒退的。现代进化理论在生物学领域已得到拓展,将发育学和古生物学与自然选择一同纳入其中,使得与该学科进行更紧密的整合尤为适时。心理学中这样一种综合的进化方法将为进化心理学所推广的适应主义提供一种有益的替代方案。尽管在此过程中比较心理学家和生物学家之间的差异可能会变得模糊,但相较于单一的心理学方法,丰富的生物学进化方法将更有利于行为科学的发展。