Gozzo Franco
Dipartimento di Scienze Molecolari Agroalimentari, Università degli Studi, Via Celoria 2, 20133 Milan, Italy.
J Agric Food Chem. 2003 Jul 30;51(16):4487-503. doi: 10.1021/jf030025s.
Plant natural resistance to potential parasites is regulated by two fundamental mechanisms: the "nonhost" and the "gene-for-gene" resistance, respectively. The latter is relevant when a cultivar resistant (R) gene product recognizes an avirulence gene product in the attacking pathogen and triggers an array of biochemical reactions that halt the pathogen around the site of attempted invasion. To cope with virulent pathogens, plants may benefit by some temporary immunity after a challenge triggering such an array of defense reactions, following a localized necrotizing infection as a possible consequence of a hypersensitive response (HR). This process, mediated by accumulation of endogenous salicylic acid (SA), is called systemic acquired resistance (SAR) and provides resistance, to a certain extent even against unrelated pathogens, such as viruses, bacteria, and fungi, for a relatively long-lasting period. SAR may be more potently activated in plants pretreated with chemical inducers, most of which appear to act as functional analogues of SA. This review summarizes the complex aspects of SAR as a way to prevent crop diseases by activating the plants' own natural defenses. The following outline is taken: (1) introduction through the historical insight of the phenomenon; (2) oxidative burst, which produces high levels of oxygen reactive species in a way similar to the inflammation state in animals and precedes the HR to the pathogen attack; (3) SAR as a coordinate action of several gene products leading to the expression of defenses well beyond the time and space limits of the HR; (4) jasmonic acid (JA) and ethylene as other endogenous factors mediating a different pathway of induced resistance; (5) pathogenesis related proteins (PR proteins) de novo synthesized as specific markers of SAR; (6) exogenous inducers of SAR, which include both synthetic chemicals and natural products; (7) the pathway of signal transduction between sensitization by inducers and PR expression, as inferred by mutageneses, a process that is still, to a large extent, not completely elucidated; (8) prospects and costs; (9) final remarks on the state-of-the-art of the topic reflecting the chemical view of the author, based on the more authoritative ones expressed by the authors of the reviewed papers.
分别是“非寄主”抗性和“基因对基因”抗性。当一个抗性(R)基因产物识别攻击病原体中的无毒基因产物并触发一系列生化反应,从而在试图入侵的部位阻止病原体时,后者就会起作用。为了应对毒性病原体,植物在引发此类防御反应的挑战后,可能会通过某种暂时的免疫而受益,这种挑战可能会引发局部坏死性感染,这是过敏反应(HR)的一个可能后果。这个由内源性水杨酸(SA)积累介导的过程称为系统获得性抗性(SAR),并在相对较长的一段时间内,甚至在一定程度上为植物提供对无关病原体(如病毒、细菌和真菌)的抗性。在用化学诱导剂预处理的植物中,SAR可能会被更有效地激活,其中大多数化学诱导剂似乎起着SA功能类似物的作用。这篇综述总结了SAR的复杂方面,将其作为一种通过激活植物自身天然防御来预防作物病害的方法。内容如下:(1)通过对该现象的历史洞察进行介绍;(2)氧化爆发,它以类似于动物炎症状态的方式产生高水平的活性氧,并且在对病原体攻击的HR之前发生;(3)SAR作为几种基因产物的协同作用,导致防御反应的表达远远超出HR的时间和空间限制;(4)茉莉酸(JA)和乙烯作为介导不同诱导抗性途径的其他内源性因素;(5)作为SAR特异性标志物的从头合成的病程相关蛋白(PR蛋白);(6)SAR的外源诱导剂,包括合成化学品和天然产物;(7)通过诱变推断的诱导剂致敏和PR表达之间的信号转导途径,这个过程在很大程度上仍未完全阐明;(8)前景和成本;(9)基于综述论文作者所表达的更具权威性的观点,对该主题的最新进展进行总结,反映作者的化学观点。