Canakci Varol, Akgül H Murat, Akgül Nilgün, Canakci Cenk Fatih
Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey.
Dent Traumatol. 2003 Oct;19(5):248-54. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-9657.2003.00199.x.
The objectives of the present study were to explore the relationship between dental trauma and handedness, and to assess the prevalence of traumatic injuries to the permanent incisors of 13-17-year-old patients, seeking treatment for various dental conditions in Erzurum, Turkey. A questionnaire focusing on handedness was administered to these patients. Handedness was assessed by the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory (Oldfield, 1971). Hand preference was divided into two classes for convenience in data analysis: (i) right-handers (GSc from 80 to 100); and (ii) left-handers (GSc from -80 to -100). This study included the 13-17-year-old group patients who had GSc as described above. Thus, the present study was carried out on 2180 (1252 male and 928 female, with a mean age of 14.9 years) out of 2392 patients. The clinical examinations and radiographic assessments were performed in full-designed dental chairs. Preliminary analysis showed no differences in rates of handedness with respect to sex and age. Overall, 10.4% of the patients were left-handers. A total of 292 (13.4%) of 2180 patients examined had one or more traumatized permanent incisors. The proportion of dental trauma was significantly higher in males than in females, 17.41% in males as compared to 7.97% in females; and ratio of the affected males to females was about 2.18. Sex difference in the prevalence of traumatized permanent incisors was statistically significant (P < 0.001). That is, males had a significantly higher risk of dental trauma than females (P < 0.001; odds ratio: 2.49; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.88, 3.23). There was a higher level of traumatized permanent incisors among left-handers than among right-handers. 28.3% of left-handers and 11.7% of right-handers had dental trauma. This difference in the prevalence of traumatized permanent incisors for handedness was statistically significant (P < 0.001). Indeed, left-handers had a significantly higher risk on dental trauma than right-handers (P < 0.001; odds ratio: 3.09; 95% CI 2.23, 4.29). The primary causative factor in the occurrence of trauma was the fall (27.7%). Then came violence and fight as the second most frequent cause of trauma (24%), followed by sports injury (18.8%). Trauma resulting from collisions and traffic accidents were accounted as 13.7 and 11.3% of all cases, respectively. The other causes were 4.5%. In conclusion, the present study suggests that left-handed adolescents have more frequent permanent incisor tooth trauma than right-handed adolescents. Left-handedness, therefore, appears to be a risk factor for trauma in 13-17-year-old adolescents.
本研究的目的是探讨牙外伤与利手之间的关系,并评估在土耳其埃尔祖鲁姆因各种牙科疾病寻求治疗的13 - 17岁患者恒切牙外伤的患病率。我们向这些患者发放了一份关注利手情况的问卷。利手情况通过爱丁堡利手量表(奥尔德菲尔德,1971年)进行评估。为方便数据分析,将利手偏好分为两类:(i)右利手(量表得分80至100);(ii)左利手(量表得分 - 80至 - 100)。本研究纳入了上述量表得分的13 - 17岁组患者。因此,本研究在2392名患者中的2180名(1252名男性和928名女性,平均年龄14.9岁)患者中进行。临床检查和影像学评估在全功能牙科椅上进行。初步分析显示,利手率在性别和年龄方面没有差异。总体而言,10.4%的患者为左利手。在接受检查的2180名患者中,共有292名(13.4%)有一颗或多颗恒切牙受过外伤。男性牙外伤的比例显著高于女性,男性为17.41%,女性为7.97%;受影响的男性与女性比例约为2.18。恒切牙外伤患病率的性别差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。也就是说,男性发生牙外伤的风险显著高于女性(P < 0.001;优势比:2.49;95%置信区间(CI)1.88, 3.23)。左利手者中恒切牙外伤的发生率高于右利手者。28.3%的左利手者和11.7%的右利手者有牙外伤。利手导致的恒切牙外伤患病率差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。事实上,左利手者发生牙外伤的风险显著高于右利手者(P < 0.001;优势比:3.09;95% CI 2.23, 4.29)。外伤发生的主要原因是跌倒(27.7%)。其次是暴力和打架,为第二常见的外伤原因(24%),随后是运动损伤(18.8%)。碰撞和交通事故导致的外伤分别占所有病例的13.7%和11.3%。其他原因占4.5%。总之,本研究表明,左利手青少年比右利手青少年更频繁发生恒切牙外伤。因此,左利手似乎是13 - 17岁青少年外伤的一个风险因素。