Goldfried Marvin R, Bell Alissa C
Department of Psychology, State University of New York, Stony Brook, NY 11794-2500, USA.
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2003 Dec;32(4):531-5. doi: 10.1207/S15374424JCCP3204_5.
The mainstream psychology literature has historically failed to include individuals with nonheterosexual sexual orientations in its study of many areas, including adolescent development, sexual development, psychotherapy, couple relationships, aging, suicide, and substance abuse. The articles contained in this issue make clear that knowledge of human behavior will be more complete when research designs are expanded to reflect more accurately the diversity of sexual orientations and sexual expressions. Furthermore, when sexuality is categorized into a rigidly defined group like lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT), it constrains the ways in which individuals might otherwise think about it. Knowledge of human behavior will be advanced more effectively when the field of psychology integrates people of diverse and complex sexualities into its research and studies the mediators and moderators associated with this diversity.
主流心理学文献在历史上一直未能将非异性恋性取向的个体纳入其许多领域的研究,这些领域包括青少年发展、性发育、心理治疗、伴侣关系、衰老、自杀和药物滥用。本期所载文章表明,当研究设计得到扩展以更准确地反映性取向和性表达的多样性时,对人类行为的认识将更加完整。此外,当将性取向严格划分为女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和跨性别者(LGBT)这样的群体时,它会限制人们对性取向的其他思考方式。当心理学领域将具有不同和复杂性取向的人纳入其研究,并研究与这种多样性相关的调节因素和中介因素时,对人类行为的认识将得到更有效的推进。