McDiarmid S V
Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Medical Center, 10833 Le Conte Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1752, USA.
Pediatr Clin North Am. 2003 Dec;50(6):1335-74. doi: 10.1016/s0031-3955(03)00150-0.
There are two critical issues on opposite ends of the timeline for patients who are eligible for liver transplantation. On the one hand, the crisis in the cadaveric organ supply makes surviving to transplant ever more risky. On the other hand, patients who receive successful transplants face the consequences of long-term immunosuppression and its potentially life-threatening complications. The donor shortage is forcing difficult decisions that affect all patients who await liver transplantation. It is important to scrutinize carefully the results of all policies that govern allocation and the ethics of the solutions we advocate to ensure that no patient subgroup is being at a disadvantage. Current immunosuppression practices are being challenged by an increasing understanding of the immunologic events triggered by the allograft and the goal to free patients from consequences of a lifetime of immunosuppression. Clinicians can expect, and perhaps require, that new immunosuppressive protocols will address how the planned intervention might be expected to advance the understanding of tolerance mechanisms. As knowledge increases, clinicians can anticipate innovative new immunosuppressive proposals. Calcineurin and steroid-free induction, the use of donor-derived bone marrow infusion, recipient pretreatment, costimulatory blockade, and new antibody induction approaches are all being proposed--often in combination--for clinical trials. Researchers face additional challenges in defining endpoints if the goal is not just the short-term reduction in rejection but the minimization, and eventual discontinuation, of immunosuppressive drugs while maintaining excellent long-term graft function. How much "failure" will be accepted and how will it be defined? How will clinicians interpret liver biopsies if they begin to accept that some lymphocytic infiltrates may be beneficial mediators of the ongoing immune activation necessary for the maintenance of tolerance? How will they adjust immunosuppression practices to the dynamic processes in the immune response that maintain tolerance? Remarkable short-term successes in providing transplants for thousands of children with liver failure have brought these challenges into sharp focus. Clinicians must seek to move the life-giving science of transplantation toward a new goal: providing long lifetimes of excellent graft function with minimal toxicity from immunosuppressive drugs and the hope of freedom from immunosuppression altogether. Pediatric liver recipients, whose grafts have inherent tolerogenic potential and for whom we can anticipate decades of life after transplant, may prove to be an ideal study population to further these goals.
对于符合肝移植条件的患者而言,在时间轴的两端存在两个关键问题。一方面,尸体器官供应危机使得患者存活至移植时面临更大风险。另一方面,成功接受移植的患者要面对长期免疫抑制及其潜在的危及生命的并发症。供体短缺迫使人们做出艰难决策,这些决策影响着所有等待肝移植的患者。仔细审查所有分配政策的结果以及我们所倡导解决方案的伦理道德非常重要,以确保没有任何患者亚组处于不利地位。随着对同种异体移植引发的免疫事件的认识不断加深,以及让患者摆脱终身免疫抑制后果这一目标的提出,当前的免疫抑制做法正受到挑战。临床医生可以期待,甚至可能要求新的免疫抑制方案能够解决计划中的干预措施如何有望推动对耐受机制的理解。随着知识的增加,临床医生可以期待创新的新免疫抑制方案。钙调神经磷酸酶和无类固醇诱导、供体来源的骨髓输注的使用、受体预处理、共刺激阻断以及新的抗体诱导方法都已被提出——通常是联合使用——用于临床试验。如果目标不仅仅是短期减少排斥反应,而是在维持良好的长期移植物功能的同时将免疫抑制药物减至最少并最终停用,那么研究人员在定义终点方面将面临额外挑战。多大程度的“失败”是可以接受 的,又将如何定义?如果临床医生开始接受某些淋巴细胞浸润可能是维持耐受所需的持续免疫激活的有益介质,他们将如何解读肝活检结果?他们将如何根据维持耐受的免疫反应中的动态过程调整免疫抑制做法?为数千名肝功能衰竭儿童提供移植手术所取得的显著短期成功,使这些挑战成为人们关注的焦点。临床医生必须努力将赋予生命的移植科学推向一个新目标:提供长期的良好移植物功能,同时使免疫抑制药物的毒性降至最低,并有望完全摆脱免疫抑制。儿科肝移植受者的移植物具有内在的致耐受性潜力,我们预计他们移植后能活数十年,他们可能是实现这些目标的理想研究人群。