• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童中更快、更灵敏的视觉诱发电位记录

Faster and more sensitive VEP recording in children.

作者信息

Mackay Alison M, Hamilton Ruth, Bradnam Michael S

机构信息

Department of Clinical Physics, University of Glasgow and Yorkhill NHS Trust, Glasgow, UK.

出版信息

Doc Ophthalmol. 2003 Nov;107(3):251-9. doi: 10.1023/b:doop.0000005334.70304.c7.

DOI:10.1023/b:doop.0000005334.70304.c7
PMID:14711157
Abstract

PURPOSE

In the difficult-to-test paediatric population, shorter test procedures are desirable. This study investigates whether Laplacian analysis of a three occipital-electrode montage detects steady-state VEPs (ssVEPs) more often or faster in children than a conventional montage, and if so, in which age groups.

METHODS

Steady-state VEPs (7.78 reversals/s; checkerboard stimulus) to various checksizes (60-3', 0.07-14 cpd equivalent) were recorded from 80 normal children aged from 1 month to 13 years and 19 adults. Active occipital electrodes were placed at Oz and symmetrically either side at 15% of the subject's half-head circumference (right occipital and left occipital, RO and LO). The Laplacian analysis used 2Oz-(RO+LO) instead of the conventional Oz-Fz. Fourier analysis and a circular T2 statistic was used to determine VEP detection time (DT). The number of responses detected overall by each analysis method and the effects of age and checksize on DT differences between analysis methods were investigated.

RESULTS

The Laplacian analysis detected more VEPs than the conventional Oz-Fz (95 versus 84%, p = 0.001) in children's age groups. The Laplacian analysis also provided faster response detection to 3' checks in all subjects over the age of five, and to 6' and 9' in 7-9-year-olds.

CONCLUSION

A Laplacian analysis offers increased sensitivity and faster VEP detection over conventional (Oz-Fz) recording in children over five for threshold-sized VEPs. Simultaneous use of both conventional (Oz-Fz) VEP recording and a Laplacian analysis in all patient ages is likely to give faster, more accurate VEP assessments.

摘要

目的

在难以进行测试的儿科人群中,更短的测试程序是可取的。本研究调查了对三个枕部电极蒙太奇进行拉普拉斯分析是否比传统蒙太奇更频繁或更快地检测到儿童的稳态视觉诱发电位(ssVEP),如果是,在哪些年龄组中。

方法

从80名年龄在1个月至13岁的正常儿童和19名成年人中记录对各种检查尺寸(60 - 3',0.07 - 14 cpd等效)的稳态视觉诱发电位(7.78次反转/秒;棋盘格刺激)。有源枕部电极放置在Oz以及在受试者半头围的15%处对称的两侧(右枕部和左枕部,RO和LO)。拉普拉斯分析使用2Oz - (RO + LO)代替传统的Oz - Fz。使用傅里叶分析和圆形T2统计量来确定视觉诱发电位检测时间(DT)。研究了每种分析方法总体检测到的反应数量以及年龄和检查尺寸对分析方法之间DT差异的影响。

结果

在儿童年龄组中,拉普拉斯分析比传统的Oz - Fz检测到更多的视觉诱发电位(95%对84%,p = 0.001)。拉普拉斯分析还在所有五岁以上的受试者中对3'检查提供了更快的反应检测,在7 - 9岁儿童中对6'和9'检查提供了更快的反应检测。

结论

对于阈值大小的视觉诱发电位,拉普拉斯分析在五岁以上儿童中比传统的(Oz - Fz)记录提供了更高的灵敏度和更快的视觉诱发电位检测。在所有患者年龄同时使用传统的(Oz - Fz)视觉诱发电位记录和拉普拉斯分析可能会提供更快、更准确的视觉诱发电位评估。

相似文献

1
Faster and more sensitive VEP recording in children.儿童中更快、更灵敏的视觉诱发电位记录
Doc Ophthalmol. 2003 Nov;107(3):251-9. doi: 10.1023/b:doop.0000005334.70304.c7.
2
Rapid detection of threshold VEPs.
Clin Neurophysiol. 2003 Jun;114(6):1009-20. doi: 10.1016/s1388-2457(03)00078-6.
3
ERGs on the brain: the benefits of simultaneous flash retinal and cortical responses in paediatric cerebral visual impairment.大脑中的视网膜电图:小儿脑性视觉障碍中同步闪光视网膜和皮质反应的益处
Doc Ophthalmol. 2018 Jun;136(3):223-227. doi: 10.1007/s10633-018-9631-4. Epub 2018 May 3.
4
Conventional pattern-reversal VEPs are not equivalent to summed multifocal VEPs.传统的图形翻转视觉诱发电位与总和性多焦视觉诱发电位并不等同。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003 Mar;44(3):1364-75. doi: 10.1167/iovs.02-0441.
5
The dependency of simultaneously recorded retinal and cortical potentials on temporal frequency.同时记录的视网膜和皮层电位对时间频率的依赖性。
Doc Ophthalmol. 2004 Jan;108(1):1-8. doi: 10.1023/b:doop.0000018367.29985.98.
6
The relationship of nystagmus waveform on the VEP response in infantile nystagmus syndrome: a small case series.婴儿型眼球震颤综合征中眼球震颤波形与视觉诱发电位反应的关系:一项小病例系列研究
Doc Ophthalmol. 2017 Feb;134(1):37-44. doi: 10.1007/s10633-016-9568-4. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
7
The changing shape of the ISCEV standard pattern onset VEP.国际临床视觉电生理学会(ISCEV)标准图形起始视觉诱发电位(VEP)不断变化的形态
Doc Ophthalmol. 2017 Aug;135(1):69-76. doi: 10.1007/s10633-017-9596-8. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
8
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Effects on Single and Paired Flash Visual Evoked Potentials.经颅直流电刺激对单次和配对闪光视觉诱发电位的影响。
Clin EEG Neurosci. 2015 Jul;46(3):208-13. doi: 10.1177/1550059414539481. Epub 2014 Sep 23.
9
Amplitude asymmetry of hemifield pattern reversal VEPs in healthy subjects.健康受试者半视野图形翻转视觉诱发电位的波幅不对称性。
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1990 Mar-Apr;77(2):81-5. doi: 10.1016/0168-5597(90)90020-e.
10
[Transient and steady-state electroretinograms and visual evoked potentials to pattern and uniform-field stimulation in humans].[人类对图形和均匀场刺激的瞬态和稳态视网膜电图及视觉诱发电位]
Fukuoka Igaku Zasshi. 1994 Jul;85(7):225-34.

引用本文的文献

1
Rhythmic visual stimulation as a window into early brain development: A systematic review.节律性视觉刺激作为探索早期大脑发育的窗口:系统综述。
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2023 Dec;64:101315. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2023.101315. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
2
VEP estimation of visual acuity: a systematic review.视诱发电位法估计视力:系统评价。
Doc Ophthalmol. 2021 Feb;142(1):25-74. doi: 10.1007/s10633-020-09770-3. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
3
VEP-based acuity assessment in low vision.低视力中基于视觉诱发电位的视力评估。

本文引用的文献

1
Development of VEP Vernier acuity and grating acuity in human infants.人类婴儿VEP游标视力和光栅视力的发育
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999 Sep;40(10):2411-7.
2
Spatial structure of the human alpha rhythm: global correlation in adults and local correlation in children.人类阿尔法波的空间结构:成人的全局相关性与儿童的局部相关性
Clin Neurophysiol. 1999 Aug;110(8):1351-62. doi: 10.1016/s1388-2457(99)00080-2.
3
Optical, receptoral, and retinal constraints on foveal and peripheral vision in the human neonate.人类新生儿中央凹和周边视觉的光学、感受器及视网膜限制因素。
Doc Ophthalmol. 2017 Dec;135(3):209-218. doi: 10.1007/s10633-017-9613-y. Epub 2017 Oct 4.
4
Sensitivity and specificity of the step VEP in suspected functional visual acuity loss.在疑似功能性视力丧失中,VEP检查第五步骤的敏感性和特异性。
Doc Ophthalmol. 2013 Apr;126(2):99-104. doi: 10.1007/s10633-012-9362-x. Epub 2012 Dec 1.
5
A comparison of the performance of three visual evoked potential-based methods to estimate visual acuity.三种基于视觉诱发电位的视力估计方法的性能比较。
Doc Ophthalmol. 2013 Feb;126(1):45-56. doi: 10.1007/s10633-012-9359-5. Epub 2012 Nov 11.
6
Monocular and binocular steady-state flicker VEPs: frequency-response functions to sinusoidal and square-wave luminance modulation.单眼和双眼稳态闪烁视觉诱发电位:对正弦和方波亮度调制的频率响应函数。
Doc Ophthalmol. 2011 Feb;122(1):63-70. doi: 10.1007/s10633-011-9260-7. Epub 2011 Jan 29.
7
Threshold determination in sweep VEP and the effects of criterion.扫描视觉诱发电位中的阈值测定及标准的影响。
Doc Ophthalmol. 2009 Oct;119(2):109-21. doi: 10.1007/s10633-009-9177-6. Epub 2009 Jun 24.
Vision Res. 1998 Dec;38(24):3857-70. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(98)00080-7.
4
Standard for visual evoked potentials 1995. The International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision.视觉诱发电位标准 1995。国际视觉临床电生理学会。
Vision Res. 1996 Nov;36(21):3567-72. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(96)00125-3.
5
Development of grating acuity and contrast sensitivity in the central and peripheral visual field of the human infant.
Vision Res. 1996 Jul;36(13):1945-53. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(95)00257-x.
6
A personal computer-based visual evoked potential stimulus and recording system.一种基于个人计算机的视觉诱发电位刺激与记录系统。
Doc Ophthalmol. 1994;86(1):81-93. doi: 10.1007/BF01224630.
7
Synaptogenesis in human visual cortex--evidence for synapse elimination during normal development.人类视觉皮层中的突触发生——正常发育过程中突触消除的证据。
Neurosci Lett. 1982 Dec 13;33(3):247-52. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(82)90379-2.
8
The morphological development of the human fovea.人类中央凹的形态发育
Ophthalmology. 1984 Jun;91(6):603-12. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(84)34247-6.
9
Structural development of the visual system of man.人类视觉系统的结构发育
Hum Neurobiol. 1984;3(2):75-80.
10
Some characteristics of average steady-state and transient responses evoked by modulated light.
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1966 Mar;20(3):238-48. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(66)90088-5.