Kenyon Kenneth R, Paz Helline, Greiner Jack V, Gipson Ilene K
Cornea Consultants, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA.
Ophthalmology. 2004 Jan;111(1):11-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2002.10.001.
To assess the clinical characteristics, incidence, and pathologic correlation of corneal epithelial adhesion abnormalities encountered during LASIK.
Prospective noncomparative interventional case series.
Five hundred consecutive eyes of 268 patients undergoing primary LASIK procedures by one surgeon utilizing the Moria LSK One microkeratome and VISX Star S-2 excimer laser.
Corneal epithelial adhesion was assessed immediately preoperatively using a cellulose surgical sponge (adhesion test), and the incidence, extent, and location of epithelial defects occurring during the microkeratome incision of the corneal flap were recorded. Epithelial specimens from 7 corneas requiring debridement of dysadhesive epithelium were examined by transmission electron microscopy.
The characteristics of the study population (age, gender, contact lens use, relevant ocular surface or systemic disease, refractive error, keratometry, pachymetry) and the microkeratome-related variables (head selection and vacuum level) were compared with the results of the preoperative epithelial adhesion test, the development of intraoperative epithelial effects (size and location), and the postoperative outcome.
Epithelial defects were sustained by 51 corneas (10.2%), and among these, 31 (6.2%) were microdefects and 20 (4.0%) were macrodefects. The adhesion test was positive (indicative of compromised adhesion of epithelium to stroma) in 20 (64.5%) corneas with microdefects, but false negatives (epithelial defect despite negative adhesion test) occurred in 11 cases (35.4%). The adhesion test was positive in 16 (80%) of corneas having macrodefects, with 4 (20%) false negatives. Thus, the overall positive predictive value of the adhesion test was 59%, and the percentage of positive prediction was 92% (Bayes' theorem). Among all other outcome measures assessed, only corneal flap thickness seemed a potential risk factor, as 40 (78.4%) epithelial defects were associated with the creation of a 180- micro m-thick flap, whereas 10 (19.6%) were associated with a 160- micro m-thick flap and only 1 (2%) occurred with a 130- micro m flap. These trends were not, however, statistically significant (P = 0.15, Fisher exact test). Transmission electron microscopy of all epithelial debridement specimens disclosed consistent abnormality of the basement membrane adhesion complex, as thickened and multilaminated basement membrane remained adherent to the intact epithelial sheet.
: Corneal epithelial dysadhesion and defects occurring in the course of LASIK surgery may be associated with an intrinsic compromise of the basement membrane adhesion complex, as evidenced clinically by the adhesion test and demonstrated pathologically by duplicated basement membrane.
评估准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)过程中遇到的角膜上皮黏附异常的临床特征、发生率及病理相关性。
前瞻性非对照性干预病例系列研究。
由一名外科医生使用Moria LSK One微型角膜刀和VISX Star S-2准分子激光对268例患者行初次LASIK手术的连续500只眼。
术前立即使用纤维素手术海绵评估角膜上皮黏附情况(黏附试验),记录角膜瓣微型角膜刀切割过程中发生的上皮缺损的发生率、范围及位置。对7例需要清除黏附不良上皮的角膜的上皮标本进行透射电子显微镜检查。
将研究人群的特征(年龄、性别、隐形眼镜使用情况、相关眼表或全身疾病、屈光不正、角膜曲率、角膜厚度)和微型角膜刀相关变量(刀头选择及负压水平)与术前上皮黏附试验结果、术中上皮影响的发生情况(大小及位置)及术后结果进行比较。
51只角膜(10.2%)出现上皮缺损,其中31只(6.2%)为微小缺损,20只(4.0%)为大缺损。在20只(64.5%)有微小缺损的角膜中黏附试验呈阳性(提示上皮与基质的黏附受损),但有11例(35.4%)出现假阴性(尽管黏附试验阴性但仍有上皮缺损)。在有大缺损的角膜中,16只(80%)黏附试验呈阳性,4只(20%)为假阴性。因此,黏附试验的总体阳性预测值为59%,阳性预测率为92%(贝叶斯定理)。在评估的所有其他观察指标中,只有角膜瓣厚度似乎是一个潜在危险因素,因为40只(78.4%)上皮缺损与制作180μm厚的角膜瓣有关,而10只(19.6%)与160μm厚的角膜瓣有关,只有1只(2%)与130μm厚的角膜瓣有关。然而,这些趋势无统计学意义(P = 0.15,Fisher精确检验)。所有上皮清除标本的透射电子显微镜检查均显示基底膜黏附复合体存在一致异常,即增厚且多层的基底膜仍附着于完整的上皮片。
LASIK手术过程中发生的角膜上皮黏附不良及缺损可能与基底膜黏附复合体的内在受损有关,黏附试验在临床上可证实,病理上可通过基底膜重复出现得以证明。