• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

氟他胺的直接胃肠道毒性:照射与未照射病例的比较

Direct gastrointestinal toxicity of flutamide: comparison of irradiated and nonirradiated cases.

作者信息

Langenstroer Peter, Porter H J, McLeod David G, Thrasher J Brantley

机构信息

Department of Urology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, 53226, USA.

出版信息

J Urol. 2004 Feb;171(2 Pt 1):684-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000106835.60202.81.

DOI:10.1097/01.ju.0000106835.60202.81
PMID:14713786
Abstract

PURPOSE

Gastrointestinal (GI) side effects of flutamide in cases treated for advanced prostate cancer are well documented. Proposed mechanisms for these side effects include increased serum blood levels, direct vehicle effects and/or local toxicity. If local toxicity, the focus of this study, mediates GI side effects of flutamide then cases exposed to external beam radiation (XRT) should have more symptoms. We hypothesize that GI side effects of flutamide are not a direct local toxic effect resulting in a similar side effect profile for irradiated and nonirradiated cases. Thus, the present study compares GI effects of flutamide in irradiated and nonirradiated cases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We identified 106 of 440 cases from a prior flutamide dose comparison study as having undergone XRT (56 cases) or radical prostatectomy (50 patients). The prevalence of GI side effects (abdominal pain/distention, diarrhea, constipation, nausea/vomiting and anorexia) was tallied for each treatment group and/or dosing regimen, 250 mg every 8 hours or 500 mg daily. Chi-square analysis with Yates' correction was performed for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The overall prevalence in 106 cases of GI side effects with flutamide was 22%. Treatment specific differences revealed no differences between the XRT and radical prostatectomy groups at 21% and 22%, respectively. Furthermore, independent analysis of treatment groups for each distinct side effect and dosing regimen did not identify significant differences.

CONCLUSIONS

Irradiated cases are not at greater risk for the development of GI side effects from flutamide, suggesting that drug induced local toxicity does not mediate GI distress.

摘要

目的

氟他胺用于晚期前列腺癌治疗时的胃肠道(GI)副作用已有充分记录。这些副作用的推测机制包括血清水平升高、直接载体效应和/或局部毒性。如果局部毒性(本研究的重点)介导了氟他胺的胃肠道副作用,那么接受外照射放疗(XRT)的患者应出现更多症状。我们假设氟他胺的胃肠道副作用并非直接局部毒性作用,因此照射和未照射患者的副作用情况相似。因此,本研究比较了照射和未照射患者中氟他胺的胃肠道效应。

材料与方法

我们从之前一项氟他胺剂量比较研究的440例患者中确定了106例,其中56例接受了XRT,50例接受了根治性前列腺切除术。统计每个治疗组和/或给药方案(每8小时250 mg或每日500 mg)的胃肠道副作用(腹痛/腹胀、腹泻、便秘、恶心/呕吐和厌食)发生率。采用Yates校正的卡方分析进行统计学分析。

结果

106例使用氟他胺患者的胃肠道副作用总体发生率为22%。治疗组间差异显示,XRT组和根治性前列腺切除术组的发生率分别为21%和22%,无显著差异。此外,对每个不同副作用和给药方案的治疗组进行独立分析,未发现显著差异。

结论

接受照射的患者发生氟他胺胃肠道副作用的风险并不更高,这表明药物诱导的局部毒性并不介导胃肠道不适。

相似文献

1
Direct gastrointestinal toxicity of flutamide: comparison of irradiated and nonirradiated cases.氟他胺的直接胃肠道毒性:照射与未照射病例的比较
J Urol. 2004 Feb;171(2 Pt 1):684-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000106835.60202.81.
2
Flutamide-associated liver toxicity during treatment with total androgen suppression and radiation therapy for prostate cancer.在前列腺癌全雄激素抑制和放射治疗期间氟他胺相关的肝毒性
Radiology. 1996 May;199(2):451-5. doi: 10.1148/radiology.199.2.8668793.
3
Flutamide photosensitivity.氟他胺光敏反应。
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 1996 Oct;12(5):216-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0781.1996.tb00203.x.
4
Prospective assessment of gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity of salvage radiotherapy for patients with prostate-specific antigen relapse or local recurrence after radical prostatectomy.前列腺癌根治术后前列腺特异性抗原复发或局部复发患者挽救性放疗的胃肠道和泌尿生殖系统毒性的前瞻性评估
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Nov 1;72(3):792-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.05.063. Epub 2008 Aug 15.
5
Flutamide versus orchidectomy in the treatment of metastatic prostate carcinoma.氟他胺与睾丸切除术治疗转移性前列腺癌的比较。
Eur Urol. 1997;32(4):391-5; discussion 395-6.
6
Complete androgen blockade as treatment for advanced prostate cancer: clinical response and side-effects.全雄激素阻断治疗晚期前列腺癌:临床疗效与副作用
Anticancer Res. 1989 Jan-Feb;9(1):13-6.
7
[Flutamide-induced late cutaneous pseudoporphyria].氟他胺诱发的迟发性皮肤假性卟啉症
Ann Dermatol Venereol. 1999 Feb;126(2):150-2.
8
[Clinical efficacy of treatment with low-dose flutamide in maximum androgen blockade therapy].低剂量氟他胺在最大雄激素阻断治疗中的临床疗效
Hinyokika Kiyo. 2001 Apr;47(4):251-5.
9
Double-blind, randomized study of primary hormonal treatment of stage D2 prostate carcinoma: flutamide versus diethylstilbestrol.D2期前列腺癌主要激素治疗的双盲、随机研究:氟他胺与己烯雌酚对比
J Clin Oncol. 1996 Aug;14(8):2250-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1996.14.8.2250.
10
Flutamide-induced liver toxicity including fatal hepatic necrosis.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1996 Mar 1;34(4):911-5. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(95)02107-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Combined androgen blockade (CAB) versus luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist monotherapy for androgen deprivation therapy.联合雄激素阻断(CAB)与黄体生成素释放激素(LHRH)激动剂单药治疗用于雄激素剥夺治疗。
World J Urol. 2020 Apr;38(4):971-979. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02847-y. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
2
Adverse events associated with hormonal therapy for prostate cancer.与前列腺癌激素治疗相关的不良事件。
Rev Urol. 2005;7 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S37-43.
3
Preventing and treating the complications of hormone therapy.
Curr Urol Rep. 2005 May;6(3):217-23. doi: 10.1007/s11934-005-0010-9.